自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤的诊疗进展

白亚飞, 陈汝满, 徐明芝, 安娜, 王春莉, 潘明娇, 孙青宜, 李洪

PDF(4163 KB)
中华肾脏病杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3) : 260-264. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20210521-00040
综述

自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤的诊疗进展

作者信息 +

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of autogenous arteriovenous fistula aneurysms

Author information +
History +

摘要

自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤(arteriovenous fistula aneurysms,AVFAs)是动静脉内瘘常见的并发症之一。动脉瘤可致皮肤变薄、破溃、感染、疼痛;血栓形成;穿刺受限;肢体缺血;高输出量心力衰竭,严重者可能出现动脉瘤破裂出血、甚至死亡。目前国内对AVFAs的治疗等方面缺乏经验及总结。本文从AVFAs的定义、分型及治疗最新进展等方面作阐述。

关键词

肾透析 / 动静脉瘘 / 动脉瘤 / 自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤

编辑

孙玉玲

引用本文

导出引用
白亚飞 , 陈汝满 , 徐明芝 , 安娜 , 王春莉 , 潘明娇 , 孙青宜 , 李洪. 自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤的诊疗进展[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2022, 38(3): 260-264. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20210521-00040.
Bai Yafei , Chen Ruman , Xu Mingzhi , An Na , Wang Chunli , Pan Mingjiao , Sun Qingyi , Li Hong. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of autogenous arteriovenous fistula aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, 2022, 38(3): 260-264. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20210521-00040.
随着血液净化技术的不断发展,维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者的生存时间延长,血管通路经久耐用显得愈发重要[1]。自体动静脉内瘘(autogenous arteriovenous fistula,AVF) 因其并发症发生率低、使用时间长等优点成为慢性肾脏病(chronic kidney disease,CKD)5D期血液透析患者的首选[2]。随着AVF使用时间的延长仍有一些并发症出现,自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤(autogenous arteriovenous fistula aneurysms,AVFAs)是其常见的晚期并发症之一。AVFAs可致皮肤变薄、破溃、感染、疼痛,血栓形成,穿刺受限,肢体缺血,高输出量心力衰竭,严重者可能出现AVFAs破裂出血,甚至死亡[3]。目前各指南及专家共识对AVFAs的定义、治疗方式尚无统一标准。本文对AVFAs的定义及治疗方式综述如下。

一、 AVFAs的定义及分型

2011年Pasklinsky等[4]定义AVFAs为:瘘体直径>周边正常内瘘血管直径的3倍或绝对直径>2 cm。而Balaz和Björck[5]和Valenti等[6]将AVFAs定义为AVF血管直径>18 mm,且为3层血管壁的扩张。中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识认为AVFAs为手术后数月或数年发生扩张,伴有搏动,瘤壁含血管壁全层,瘤体内径>相邻正常血管内径3倍以上且内径>2 cm[2]。AVFAs瘤壁含有血管壁全层,而假性动脉瘤则是由于穿刺出血而造成的通路血管周围形成血肿,与内瘘血管相通,伴有搏动,其瘤壁是血肿机化后形成的纤维壁[3]
目前各指南或专家共识并没有对AVFAs进行分型。现有文献报道的分型方式有Valenti分型和Balaz分型。Valenti分型将AVFAs分为4型:Ⅰ型:无驼峰样AVFAs,Ⅰa型:静脉从吻合口全程大部分均匀扩张;Ⅰb型:吻合口近心端5 cm以内的扩张。Ⅱ型:驼峰样动脉瘤,Ⅱa型:静脉至少有1个局部扩张,常见为2个,呈经典的驼峰样扩张,多与透析穿刺部位相关,动脉瘤之间的静脉直径正常或狭窄;Ⅱb型:既有吻合口后动脉瘤,也有穿刺局部扩张,是Ⅰb型和Ⅱa型的组合。Ⅲ型:复杂型或特殊型动脉瘤,无典型特征。Ⅳ型:假性动脉瘤[6]。Balaz分型是基于超声或造影检查发现的狭窄或血栓基础上进行的分型。Balaz Ⅰ型:无狭窄或血栓;Ⅱ型:血管狭窄>50%,可分为流入动脉狭窄(Ⅱa)、吻合口狭窄(Ⅱb)、流出道狭窄(Ⅱc)或中央静脉狭窄(Ⅱd);Ⅲ型:>50%的血管伴有血栓;Ⅳ型:全部管腔血栓形成[5]。见图1图2
图1 自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤Valenti分型示意图

Full size|PPT slide

图2 自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤Balaz分型示意图

Full size|PPT slide

二、 AVFAs形成机制

AVFAs发生率由5%~60%不等[3,7-11]。AVF自建立至逐渐发展为真性动脉瘤平均时间为24~51个月[1,3-4]。AVFAs形成机制目前尚不明确[12],有以下病因和影响因素与AVFAs发生有关,包括:(1)尿毒症全身微炎症状态和毒素对血管的损害:终末期肾病患者在AVF建立前就存在血管内皮损害、血管钙化、内膜增生;全身性微炎症、氧化应激状态、高血压、钙磷代谢紊乱;高浓度肾素、血管紧张素、同型半胱氨酸、吲哚、不对称二甲基精氨酸等诸多促成动脉瘤的因素;(2)血流动力学及剪切力变化:AVF吻合后动-静脉接通,静脉内压力骤然升高、血液流速加大、涡流形成等因素,影响内皮细胞和平滑肌细胞功能,纵向压力对动脉瘤进展比剪切力影响大10 000倍;透析治疗时血泵驱动对动静脉穿刺针出入口附近血流动力学影响等[13-15];(3)反复穿刺内瘘后血管对损伤的反应[12];(4)内瘘局部狭窄性病变(例如反复穿刺导致的瘘管狭窄、中心静脉狭窄等)导致狭窄远心端AVF压力增高,血管迂曲、扩张[12];(5)遗传性疾病:例如多囊肾、Alport综合征等[5-6,16-18];(6)高血压和免疫抑制[19];(7)中心静脉狭窄可导致静脉高压加速动脉瘤的形成[11],中心静脉狭窄通常由中心静脉导管引起,发生率为13%~100%[20-22]
AVF各种吻合方式均可发生AVFAs,不论是标准桡动脉-头静脉吻合为主[3,23],还是肱动脉-头静脉吻合[8,24],或鼻烟窝内瘘为主的AVF都可能发生动脉瘤[25]。于青等[26]研究发现有2/3的上臂AVF患者伴AVFAs形成,局部反复穿刺、内瘘部位、高血压及血管本身病变是AVFAs形成的影响因素;而AVF吻合方式、透析后止血方式、血钙、血磷及甲状旁腺素水平并非AVFAs形成的影响因素。AVFAs形成与内瘘建立方式和部位有无显著相关性还需进一步的队列研究证实。如果AVF吻合口过大,瘘口血流速度高,压力大,使瘘口局部易膨出;吻合时过多剥离血管外膜,由于血管外膜含有肾上腺素能α受体,剥离过多使吻合口处失去收缩功能而易于扩张[27]
白亚飞等[1]和张丽红等[3]报道AVFAs发生部位不同其形成机制也可不同。发生于吻合口附近者多由于吻合口部位血流动力学因素导致静脉侧内膜增生出现狭窄,狭窄远心端压力增大使其局部血管膨出并形成动脉瘤;或手术时吻合口过大、静脉血管外膜剥离过多引起局部血管膨出并形成动脉瘤;穿刺区域动脉瘤主要与内瘘过早使用、定点或区域穿刺导致血管壁损伤、血管重塑等相关;非穿刺部位的静脉流出道动脉瘤多与解剖结构有关,如静脉汇入点成角、存在环形僵硬静脉瓣等形成狭窄,狭窄远心端部位容易形成动脉瘤,当同时合并高流量内瘘时内瘘压力大更易形成狭窄远心端动脉瘤;中心静脉狭窄或头静脉弓狭窄可引起AVF的全程动脉瘤。

三、 AVFAs的治疗

1. AVFAs手术治疗指证: 2019版改善全球肾脏疾病预后组织(KDOQI)血管通路指南指出AVFAs手术治疗时机包括:(1)动脉瘤快速增大面临破裂危险;(2)动脉瘤附近 AVF 狭窄合并血栓、内瘘闭塞;(3)吻合口AVFAs及AVFAs合并感染;(4)患者不可接受的外观、穿刺困难及疼痛等[28]。有学者认为当动脉瘤合并高流量内瘘导致高输出量心力衰竭或窃血综合征时需行手术治疗[11,29]。也有学者认为AVFAs局部皮肤逐渐变薄、坏死、感染、皮肤受损、局部疼痛、破裂出血及穿刺区域减少也是手术的指证[11,24]。无症状AVFAs不建议手术治疗,动脉瘤的大小并不是手术指证[28]。也有作者认为与AVFAs美容相关的问题是主观的,通常认为不是干预的指证。如果因美容问题对无其他症状的动脉瘤进行手术干预,必需权衡手术潜在的并发症,应与患者明确解释出血、血栓形成和通路丧失等风险[11]
Balaz和Björck[5]将AVFAs治疗的适应证主要分为3种情况:A组适应证与患者的不适症状有关,可能是动脉瘤压迫周围神经的结果;B组适应证与出血风险有关,主要原因为皮肤变薄或侵蚀导致瘘管暴露、皮肤炎症、动脉瘤迅速扩张、AVF内高压力、同侧肢体水肿和拔针后出血时间延长;C组适应证与AVF血流量有关,分为高流量AVF和低流量AVF,高流量AVF有发生高输出量心力衰竭和窃血综合征的风险,低流量AVF伴有供血动脉、吻合口附近或动脉瘤间的狭窄。AVFAs直径作为单独参数并不是手术治疗的指标。
2. AVFAs的手术治疗: 白亚飞等[1]研究发现应根据AVFAs的位置、大小及形成原因的不同采取不同的治疗方式。发生于吻合口部位的局限型AVFAs可采取切除动脉瘤并行吻合口近心端AVF重建,该手术方式并未减少AVF的穿刺部位,且术后即可使用,避免了中心静脉穿刺置管。发生于吻合口近心端或穿刺部位的AVFAs可采用AVFAs瘤壁部分切除+缩窄成形术治疗。部分动脉瘤切除和修复术是一种有针对性的手术方法,通过切除不健康或过多的组织,尽可能利用原血管壁重建血管通路[30],具有简单、有效并能保持AVF通畅的优点,且不用使用移植血管,无需使用透析导管过渡,并发症低。当静脉壁易碎或严重钙化时,不宜行动脉瘤修补术[21]。AVFAs瘤壁部分切除后采用12F~16F导尿管作为支撑连续缝合修复动脉瘤,这样可以精确地控制血管内径,起到限流和防止复发的作用[1]。切除动脉瘤表面受累的菲薄皮肤及皮下组织,不仅可以改善皮肤外观,还可以加强对手术区域血管张力的限制,减少术后切口愈合不良的概率[21,29]
Rokošný等[31]报道动脉瘤部分切除修复术后外面加用人工聚酯纤维网状管加固,以防止动脉瘤的复发。62例患者接受动脉瘤切除修复术+人工聚酯纤维网状管加固后6个月和12个月的初期通畅率分别为86%和79%,6个月和12个月的辅助通畅率分别为89%和80%,但与不使用人工聚酯纤维网状管加固组相比,两组患者的12个月通畅率的差异无统计学意义[32]。一篇Meta荟萃分析共纳入597例AVFAs患者,其中位于上臂者289例(59%),治疗主要目的为预防出血513例(86%),首选治疗方式是动脉瘤部分切除修复术,12个月的初级通畅率为82%[32]。使用外部修复强化,用缝合器和未使用缝合器进行的动脉瘤切除修复术的两组间12个月初级通畅率相近[32]
对因中心静脉狭窄或头静脉弓狭窄引起的长段AVFAs可行经皮腔内血管成形术(percutaneous transluminal angioplasty,PTA)、AVF限流术、PTA+支架置入术、PTA+AVF限流术、PTA+支架置入+AVF限流术、AVF结扎+对侧AVF成形术[12]。限流术可以采用环阻法、miller限流术或使用人造血管制成 3~4 个血管箍包绕AVF后缝合固定起到缩窄内瘘减少内瘘血流量作用[33-35]。高流量AVF限流手术能够降低60%~80%的AVF内压力,从而限制了动脉瘤的继续生长[35]。如果AVF有其他侧支且能提供足够的血流量则可将动脉瘤直接切除[1]
如果AVF血管狭窄多发、难以解除,动脉瘤多发、 巨大、累及范围广或管壁硬化明显无法进行部分切除,可以采用动脉瘤切除、间插移植血管的方法完成重建[36]。AVFAs切除后可行人工血管间插式端端吻合,或取相应长度的人造血管跨越动脉瘤或狭窄段做搭桥,或行动脉瘤切除联合全程人工血管置换术[24,33,37-38],如果AVG跨越肘关节,应使用带支撑环的人工血管。人工血管应于创面外侧或内侧另行隧道植入,避免直接埋入动脉瘤剥离创面,以降低术后血肿、人工血管感染和穿刺区域受限风险。亦有报道使用自体大隐静脉移植的方法修复AVF动脉瘤[39]。但人工血管置换术费用高,缺乏与AVFAs瘤壁部分切除修复术长期通畅率比较的对照研究。
有文献报道可以应用覆膜支架治疗AVFAs[40],但其有时不能安全地固定支架,特别是在有不规则管腔的AVF中。如果位置放错,支架可能会导致血栓形成;不能消除扩张的动脉瘤;通过支架移植物重复穿刺可能会增加并发症的风险,价格昂贵,且不适用于AVFAs美容[30]。KDOQI指南建议仅对有外科手术禁忌证或缺乏外科手术选择时才选择覆膜支架植入,但仍存在感染的风险,尽可能避免在支架区域穿刺[28]。穿刺支架植入区域可导致支架变形、塌陷甚至管腔消失[41-42]。覆膜支架治疗AVFAs不合适的情况还包括靠近吻合口的动脉瘤、窃血综合征和缺乏足够固定区域的大动脉瘤[11]。用覆膜支架行腔内隔绝术治疗动脉瘤目前存在很大争议。 覆膜支架的主要劣势在于锚定困难,外观改善不明显,感染和血栓形成的概率增加等[21,24,30],具有一定的局限性,并有更高的感染率,特别是当覆盖的组织菲薄时[43-44]。一旦发生AVFAs破裂,必须紧急局部压迫止血。对于破裂的AVFAs治疗,国内报道均采用内瘘结扎术[45-46]

四、 总结

AVFAs是AVF晚期常见的并发症,当AVFAs出现快速增大面临破裂危险,动脉瘤附近AVF狭窄合并血栓、内瘘闭塞,AVF过度扩大和曲张,AVF合并高流量所致的高输出量心力衰竭或窃血综合征,AVF局部的皮肤逐渐变薄、坏死、感染、皮肤受损、局部疼痛、破裂出血及穿刺区域减少时需行手术治疗。对于发生于吻合口部位的局限型AVFAs,可以采取切除动脉瘤并行吻合口近心端AVF重建;发生于吻合口近心端或穿刺部位的AVFAs,可行AVFAs瘤壁部分切除修复术;因中心静脉狭窄或头静脉弓狭窄引起的长段AVFAs可行血管腔内治疗或AVF限流术,必要时行AVF结扎及对侧AVF成形术。覆膜支架治疗AVFAs具有一定的局限性,费用高昂,且增加感染的风险,需谨慎使用。无症状的AVFAs不建议手术治疗。

参考文献

[1]
白亚飞, 陈汝满, 徐明芝, 等. 自体内瘘瘤样扩张缩窄术临床疗效观察[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2019, 19(5): 358-361. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2019.05.011.
[2]
中国医院协会血液净化中心分会血管通路工作组. 中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识(第2版)[J]. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(6): 365-381. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2019.06.001.
[3]
张丽红, 詹申, 王玉柱. 自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤诊治体会[J]. 中国血液净化, 2015, 14(1): 37-40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2015.01.010.
[4]
Pasklinsky G, Meisner RJ, Labropoulos N, et al. Management of true aneurysms of hemodialysis access fistulas[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 53(5): 1291-1297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.100.
This study was designed to determine the clinical presentation, characteristics, and management of true aneurysms in dialysis access fistulas.Patients presenting with symptoms or functional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) problems and aneurysmal enlargement of the outflow vein were evaluated with duplex ultrasound scans. Dilatation to more than three times the native vessel diameter was considered aneurysmal. Pseudoaneurysms were excluded from the study. Patients' demographics, aneurysm characteristics (diameter, location, thrombus, association with stenosis, and outflow obstruction), symptoms, type of treatment, and follow-up were recorded.Twenty-three patients with a mean age of 55 years were found to have 29 upper extremity aneurysms of the outflow vein on duplex ultrasound scan. Nine patients (39%) had radiocephalic, 11 patients (48%) had brachiocephalic, 2 patients (9%) had brachiobasilic, and 1 patient (4%) had radiobasilic arteriovenous fistula. The average aneurysm size was 3.3 cm and the mean time from fistula placement to treatment was 47.1 months. Four patients (17%) were asymptomatic and were repaired due to technical and mechanical problems with AVFs, including stenosis and lack of normal vein for cannulation, compromising continued use. Nineteen patients (83%) presented with symptoms, including pain (48%), skin changes (30%), venous hypertension (22%), steal syndrome (22%), and high output failure (9%). Four patients (17%) were found to have outflow vein stenosis, 2 patients (9%) had central venous stenosis, and 2 patients (9%) had central venous occlusion. In 13 patients (56%) who had a functioning kidney transplant, the fistula was ligated with or without aneurysm excision. Three of the 13 patients developed superficial phlebitis with 1 patient requiring surgical evacuation of a clot; the other 2 patients were managed conservatively. Two of the 13 patients required creation of new access due to renal transplant failure. In the remaining 10 patients, the aneurysm was treated and the fistula salvaged due to a persistent need for hemodialysis. The median follow-up of these patients was 19 months ranging from 8 to 25 months. Seven patients (30%) underwent excision and repair with the great saphenous vein and 3 patients (13%) had excision and repair with prosthetic material, 2 of which underwent central venous angioplasty and stenting. Two patients developed thrombosis of their repair requiring new access in the contralateral arm. Three patients needed secondary percutaneous interventions for anastomotic stenosis.Although true aneurysms in patients with dialysis access are uncommon, significant complications may occur as a consequence of their presence. These complications can be treated and the fistulas can usually be salvaged.Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
[5]
Balaz P, Björck M. True aneurysm in autologous hemodialysis fistulae: definitions, classification and indications for treatment[J]. J Vasc Access, 2015, 16(6): 446-453. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000391.
Definition, etiology, classification and indication for treatment of the arteriovenous access (AVA) aneurysm are poorly described in medical literature. The objectives of the paper are to complete this information gap according to the extensive review of the literature.A literature search was performed of the articles published between April 1, 1967, and March 1, 2014. The databases searched included Medline and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The eligibility criteria in this review studies the need to assess the association of aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms with autologous AVA. Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms involving prosthetic AVA were not included in this literature review. From a total of 327 papers, 54 non-English papers, 40 case reports and 167 papers which did not meet the eligibility criteria were removed. The remaining 66 papers were reviewed.Based on the literature the indication for the treatment of an AVA aneurysm is its clinical presentation related to the patient's discomfort, bleeding prevention and inadequate access flow. A new classification system of AVA aneurysm, which divides it into the four types, was also suggested.AVA aneurysm is characterized by an enlargement of all three vessel layers with a diameter of more than 18 mm and can be presented in four types according to the presence of stenosis and/or thrombosis. The management of an AVA aneurysm depends on several factors including skin condition, clinical symptoms, ease of cannulation and access flow. The diameter of the AVA aneurysm as a solo parameter is not an indication for the treatment.
[6]
Valenti D, Mistry H, Stephenson M. A novel classification system for autogenous arteriovenous fistula aneurysms in renal access patients[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2014, 48(7-8): 491-496. DOI: 10.1177/1538574414561229.
Arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) constructed for hemodialysis access are prone to aneurysmal degeneration. This can lead to life-threatening sequelae such as aneurysmal rupture. The literature includes various guidelines on the management of certain aspects of access-related aneurysm formation; however, no classification system exists to guide reporting or prognostication. We aimed to create a universally acceptable classification for these aneurysms and establish guidance about their management.
[7]
Salahi H, Fazelzadeh A, Mehdizadeh A, et al. Complications of arteriovenous fistula in dialysis patients[J]. Transplant Proc, 2006, 38(5): 1261-1264. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.066.
[8]
Al-Thani H, El-Menyar A, Al-Thani N, et al. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of surgically treated arteriovenous fistula aneurysm in patients on regular hemodialysis[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2017, 41: 46-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.046.
To investigate the clinical characteristics, surgical interventions, and outcomes of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) aneurysms, we retrospectively analyzed patients on regular hemodialysis (HD).We conducted a cohort study of all patients with HD access who presented with AVF aneurysms and underwent operative procedures over a 11-year period. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, vascular access characteristics, management of aneurysms, complications, and outcomes were analyzed.Of the 700 end-stage renal failure patients, 530 patients were maintained on HD (130 through PermCath and 400 through AV access in terms of AVF and arteriovenous graft). We identified 129 patients who developed AV aneurysms, and 40 of them required surgical interventions (24 men and 16 women) with a mean age of 58 ± 14.6 years. The 40 patients who developed AVF aneurysms underwent 43 surgical interventions. The majority of aneurysms were presented with thinning and ulceration (82.5%) of the overlying skin. Thirty-four patients had true aneurysms and 6 had pseudoaneurysms. The aneurysmal AVF comprised 26 brachiocephalic fistulas, 9 radiocephalic fistulas, 3 brachial artery grafts, 1 ulnar-basilic fistula, and 1 Fem-Fem graft at presentation. Patients were treated mainly with ligation (13; 32.5%), excision and repair with graft interposition (15; 37.5%) or vein interposition (11; 27.5%), and end-to-end AVF (1; 2.5%). The median follow-up postsurgery duration was 53 months (range 1-192) and the median duration from fistula creation to the surgical intervention was 52 months (range 4-182). On follow-up, 34 patients continued on HD, while 5 underwent renal transplantation and 1 shifted to peritoneal dialysis. The overall all-cause mortality rate was 37.5% and the leading causes of mortality were sepsis/pneumonia (60%), myocardial infarction, and heart failure (40%).In HD patients, the rate of AVF aneurysmal formation is high with a significant rate of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, timely and appropriate evaluation and surgical intervention are crucial.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[9]
Inston N, Mistry H, Gilbert J, et al. Aneurysms in vascular access: state of the art and future developments[J]. J Vasc Access, 2017, 18(6): 464-472. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000828.
A master class was held at the Vascular Access at Charing Cross (VA@CX2017) conference in April 2017 with invited experts and active audience participation to discuss arteriovenous (AV) vascular access aneurysms, a serious and common complication of vascular access (VA). The natural history of aneurysms in VA is poorly defined, and although classifications exist they are not uniformly applied in studies or clinical practice. True and pseudo aneurysms of AV access occur. Whilst an AV fistula by definition is an abnormal dilatation of a blood vessel, an agreed definition of 18 mm, or 3 times accepted maturation diameter, is proposed. The mechanism of aneurysmal dilatation is unknown but appears to be a combination of excessive external remodeling, wall changes due to injury, and obstruction of outflow. Diagnosis of AV aneurysms is based on physical examination and ultrasound. Venography and cross-sectional imaging may assist and be required for the investigation of outflow stenosis. Treatment of pseudo aneurysms and true aneurysms of VA (AVA) is not evidence-based, but relies on clinical experience and available facilities. In many AVA, a conservative approach with surveillance is suitable, although intervals and modalities are unclear. Avoidance of rupture is imperative and preemptive treatment should aim for access preservation, ideally with avoidance of prosthetic materials. Different techniques of aneurysmorrhaphy are described with good results in published series. Although endovascular approaches and stenting are described with good short-term results, issues with cannulation of stented areas occur and, while possible, this is not recommended, and long-term access revision is recommended.
[10]
Huber TS, Carter JW, Carter RL, et al. Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: a systematic review[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2003, 38(5): 1005-1011. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00426-9.
Patency rates for autogenous accesses are presumed to be better than for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) accesses, although the strength of the supporting evidence is limited. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis that patency rates for upper extremity autogenous hemodialysis arteriovenous accesses in adults are superior to those for PTFE counterparts.A systematic review of relevant literature and meta-analysis of the patency data were performed. Studies were considered acceptable if patency data were reported by either life table or Kaplan-Meier method, including number of patients at risk.The thirty-four studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria were composed predominantly of case series or nonrandomized controlled studies; no randomized, controlled studies comparing autogenous and PTFE accesses were included. The primary patency rate for autogenous accesses was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-74%) at 6 months and 51% (95% CI, 48%-53%) at 18 months, and the corresponding primary patency rate for PTFE accesses was 58% (95% CI, 56%-61%) and 33% (95% CI, 31%-36%), respectively. The secondary patency rate for autogenous accesses was 86% (95% CI, 84%-88%) at 6 months and 77% (95% CI, 74%-79%) at 18 months, and the corresponding secondary patency rate for PTFE accesses was 76% (95% CI, 73%-79%) and 55% (95% CI, 51%-59%), respectively.The patency rate for autogenous upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses in adults is superior to that for PTFE counterparts, although the overall quality of the studies in the meta-analysis was less than ideal. Randomized, controlled studies to further examine the differences in outcome between these two access types are necessary.
[11]
Rokosny S, O′Neill S, Balaz P. Contemporary management of arteriovenous haemo -dialysis fistula aneurysms[J]. Cor et Vasa, 2018, 60(1): 49-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.10.005.
[12]
李洪, 白亚飞, 安娜, 等. 自体动静脉内瘘动脉瘤血管玻璃样变是血管扩张和动脉瘤部分切除术后复发的主要病理基础[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(33): 4209-4213, 4221. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.504.
背景 2019年中国已有60万维持性血液透析(MHD)患者登记在册,其中80%以上患者的透析“生命线”为自体动静脉内瘘(AVF)。而自体动静脉内瘘动脉瘤(AVFAs)是AVF最常见并发症之一,对AVFAs的研究有助于其防控。目的 通过研究AVFAs部分切除术中切除的病变血管组织学,追踪患者AVFAs复发情况,探索AVFAs组织病理与AVFAs复发相关机制,制定相应可行防治措施。方法 选择2016年4月—2019年10月在海南省人民医院进行以AVFAs部分切除术为主的修复手术的13例复杂型AVFAs患者,取切除动脉瘤血管组织(5~10)mm×(5~10)mm做病理分析;追踪AVFAs变化。结果 13例患者手术均成功;术后追踪3~39个月,平均(22.4±11.9)个月;其中7例患者术后3~6个月AVFAs复发;12例患者内瘘通畅。病理:血管内皮细胞(ECs)明显减少或消失;内中膜成纤维细胞及胶原组织增生、排列紊乱,内外弹力层不完整或完全消失,网状纤维和弹力纤维减少;平滑肌细胞(SMAs)减少或完全消失。13例患者瘤壁存在既往从未报道的大范围玻璃样变性,其中10例累及血管壁全程,同时散在黏液样变性、局灶性钙化混合或单独存在;玻璃样变性累及管壁全程者追踪期间6例复发。结论 AVFAs瘤体部分切除术对预防血管破裂、保留血管资源有效;术中利用的内瘘血管存在严重玻璃样变、散在黏液样变、局灶性钙化多种变性,使AVFAs容易复发,尤其是在修复部位继续穿刺;扣眼穿刺可能降低AVFAs患病率和修复术后复发率;瘤体早期局部加压可以延缓病情发展、减少干预;更大样本AVFAs组织学研究、不同AVF穿刺方法对AVFAs患病率影响的对照研究、AVFAs患病相关基因谱研究需进行。
[13]
Lee T, Roy-Chaudhury P. Advances and new frontiers in the pathophysiology of venous neointimal hyperplasia and dialysis access stenosis[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2009, 16(5): 329-338. DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2009.06.009.
[14]
Allon M, Robbin ML, Umphrey HR, et al. Preoperative arterial microcalcification and clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2015, 66(1): 84-90. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.015.
Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) often fail to mature, but the mechanism of AVF nonmaturation is poorly understood. Arterial microcalcification is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may limit vascular dilatation, thereby contributing to early postoperative juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis and impaired AVF maturation. This study evaluated whether preexisting arterial microcalcification adversely affects AVF outcomes.Prospective study.127 patients with CKD undergoing AVF surgery at a large academic medical center.Preexisting arterial microcalcification (≥1% of media area) assessed independently by von Kossa stains of arterial specimens obtained during AVF surgery and by preoperative ultrasound.Juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis (ascertained by ultrasound obtained 4-6 weeks postoperatively), AVF nonmaturation (inability to cannulate with 2 needles with dialysis blood flow ≥ 300mL/min for ≥6 sessions in 1 month within 6 months of AVF creation), and duration of primary unassisted AVF survival after successful use (time to first intervention).Arterial microcalcification was present by histologic evaluation in 40% of patients undergoing AVF surgery. The frequency of a postoperative juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis was similar in patients with or without preexisting arterial microcalcification (32% vs 42%; OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.28-1.52; P=0.3). AVF nonmaturation was observed in 29%, 33%, 33%, and 33% of patients with <1%, 1% to 4.9%, 5% to 9.9%, and ≥10% arterial microcalcification, respectively (P=0.9). Sonographic arterial microcalcification was found in 39% of patients and was associated with histologic calcification (P=0.001), but did not predict AVF nonmaturation. Finally, among AVFs that matured, unassisted AVF maturation (time to first intervention) was similar for patients with and without preexisting arterial microcalcification (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.21; P=0.2).Single-center study.Arterial microcalcification is common in patients with advanced CKD, but does not explain postoperative AVF stenosis, AVF nonmaturation, or AVF failure after successful cannulation.Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[15]
Cronewett JL, Johnston KW. Rutherford's vascular surgery[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2010.
[16]
Inston N, Mistry H, Gilbert J, et al. Aneurysms in vascular access: state of the art and future developments[J]. J Vasc Access, 2017, 18(6): 464-472. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000828.
A master class was held at the Vascular Access at Charing Cross (VA@CX2017) conference in April 2017 with invited experts and active audience participation to discuss arteriovenous (AV) vascular access aneurysms, a serious and common complication of vascular access (VA). The natural history of aneurysms in VA is poorly defined, and although classifications exist they are not uniformly applied in studies or clinical practice. True and pseudo aneurysms of AV access occur. Whilst an AV fistula by definition is an abnormal dilatation of a blood vessel, an agreed definition of 18 mm, or 3 times accepted maturation diameter, is proposed. The mechanism of aneurysmal dilatation is unknown but appears to be a combination of excessive external remodeling, wall changes due to injury, and obstruction of outflow. Diagnosis of AV aneurysms is based on physical examination and ultrasound. Venography and cross-sectional imaging may assist and be required for the investigation of outflow stenosis. Treatment of pseudo aneurysms and true aneurysms of VA (AVA) is not evidence-based, but relies on clinical experience and available facilities. In many AVA, a conservative approach with surveillance is suitable, although intervals and modalities are unclear. Avoidance of rupture is imperative and preemptive treatment should aim for access preservation, ideally with avoidance of prosthetic materials. Different techniques of aneurysmorrhaphy are described with good results in published series. Although endovascular approaches and stenting are described with good short-term results, issues with cannulation of stented areas occur and, while possible, this is not recommended, and long-term access revision is recommended.
[17]
Field MA, McGrogan DG, Tullet K, et al. Arteriovenous fistula aneurysms in patients with Alport's[J]. J Vasc Access, 2013, 14(4): 397-399. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000167.
Alport's syndrome is a rare but important cause of renal failure. It is characterized by Type IV collagen mutations resulting in connective tissue disorders and renal and cochlear dysfunction. Vascular basement membrane also contains collagen IV and the effect on arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) is not reported. Anecdotally, we observed a high rate of aneurysm formation in Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) of patients with Alport's and sought to determine whether this was the case within our population.All patients with a diagnosis of Alport's were identified from a contemporaneously maintained database. AVFs formed in patients with Alport's were identified to define the incidence of aneurysms in this group.A total of 40 patients with a diagnosis of Alport's were identified. Of these, 20 patients had undergone AVF formation, the remainder opting for CAPD as renal replacement or had undergone pre-emptive transplantation. Of the 20 patients identified, 11 had an AVF and of these the rate of aneurysm formation was high (55%).While this finding of high rate of aneurysmal AVF in Alport's patients is a purely observational finding within our population further population study would be extremely interesting and could support enhanced surveillance or alternative dialysis modalities in Alport's syndrome patients.
[18]
Hadimeri H, Hadimeri U, Attman PO, et al. Dimensions of arteriovenous fistulas in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease[J]. Nephron, 2000, 85(1): 50-53. DOI: 10.1159/000045629.
Aneurysms are known manifestations of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). We investigated whether the dimensions of arteriovenous fistulas created for performance of haemodialysis were affected by the original disease.The lumen diameter of the fistula was studied by ultrasound in 19 patients with ADPKD and in 19 control patients. The patients' sex, age, the duration of their fistulas, haemoglobin values and blood pressure levels were similar in both groups. The monitoring was performed along the forearm part of the vein, and the maximal diameter was measured. The diameters at the two needle insertion sites were also measured.The ADPKD patients had a significantly higher fistula diameter than the control patients: 12 (range 8-19) mm versus 8 (range 6-24) mm at the widest level (p = 0. 003). There were no significant differences in the diameters at the needle insertion sites.The receiving veins of arteriovenous fistulas in patients with ADPKD have an abnormality that causes a greater than normal dilatation in response to the arterialization. We postulate that this phenomenon is linked with the increased prevalence of aneurysms in ADPKD.Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
[19]
Englesbe MJ, Wu AH, Clowes AW, et al. The prevalence and natural history of aortic aneurysms in heart and abdominal organ transplant patients[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2003, 37(1): 27-31. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.57.
The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence and clinical features of aortic aneurysms in heart and abdominal transplant patients.We undertook a retrospective review of 1557 patients who had heart, liver, or kidney transplantation between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 2000. Aortic aneurysms were identified by computed tomographic scan, ultrasound scan, or at the time of surgery for rupture. An aortic diameter of 3.5 cm was used as the threshold for the definition of aneurysmal disease. We compared dichotomous variables with Fisher's exact test and continuous variables with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.There were 296 heart, 450 liver, and 811 kidney transplants performed on adult patients during the study period. We identified 18 transplant patients who had an aortic aneurysm (13 heart, three liver, two kidney). Seven patients (41%) had rupture of the aortic aneurysm, and five of these patients died. There were no deaths from causes other than aortic aneurysm rupture. The rate of aneurysm rupture was 22.5% per year. Eight patients had the aortic aneurysm repaired electively with no deaths and no hospital stay greater than 15 days. The mean aortic aneurysm size at rupture was 6.02 +/- 0.86 cm, and the smallest aneurysm that ruptured was 5.1 cm. The pretransplant rate of aortic aneurysm expansion was 0.46 cm/y, but this increased to 1.00 cm/y after transplantation (P =.08). The rate of aortic aneurysm expansion among heart transplant patients and abdominal transplant patients was the same (P =.51). The prevalence of aortic aneurysm was 4.1% in cardiac transplant patients and 0.4% in abdominal transplant patients. Earlier in our series (1987 to 1996), 11% of the cardiac transplant patients were screened for aortic aneurysms, and the prevalence rate of diagnosis was 3.0%. Screening of cardiac transplant candidates became more frequent in 1997 (87% screened), with an associated increase in the aortic aneurysm prevalence rate to 5.8% in the patients who were screened.Aortic aneurysms in cardiac and abdominal transplant patients have an aggressive natural history with high expansion and rupture rates. Screening transplant patients for aortic aneurysms will increase detection and facilitate elective repair, which is generally well tolerated. These findings support programs for early detection and elective treatment of aortic aneurysms in organ transplant patients, particularly those having heart transplants.
[20]
Rajput A, Rajan DK, Simons ME, et al. Venous aneurysms in autogenous hemodialysis fistulas: is there an association with venous outflow stenosis[J]. J Vasc Access, 2013, 14(2): 126-130. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000111.
To determine whether patients with venous aneurysms in their arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have associated venous outflow stenoses.A retrospective study was performed, which included all patients presenting with dysfunction and had venous aneurysms in their AVFs. Patient's medical records and imaging studies were examined and data collected including access characteristics, patient demographics and imaging findings. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.A total of 89 patients (58 men, 31 women; mean age 60) presented for intervention related to access dysfunction with incident venous aneurysms over the study period. Of the 89 patients with venous aneurysms (mean diameter 2.3 cm) of their AVF's, 69 (78%) patients had an associated venous outflow stenosis. The stenoses were present most commonly in the outflow cephalic vein (57%), followed by the cephalic arch (20%), brachiocephalic vein (10%) and subclavian vein (6%). Outflow stenoses in AVFs with venous aneurysms were observed in 87% of brachiocephalic AVFs, 60% of radiocephalic AVFs and 80% of brachiobasilic AVFs. Brachiocephalic AVFs with venous aneurysms were significantly more likely to have an associated outflow stenosis than radiocephalic AVFs with venous aneurysms (P=0.007). AVFs with outflow stenosis were on average 1502 days old while AVFs without outflow stenosis were on average 2351 days old, which was a statistically significant difference (P=0.031). No statistically significant differences were observed for sex and side of the fistula.Outflow stenosis was observed to be associated with venous aneurysms in AVFs with a more statistically significant association in brachiocephalic AVFs compared to other AVFs.
[21]
Vo T, Tumbaga G, Aka P, et al. Staple aneurysmorrhaphy to salvage autogenous arteriovenous fistulas with aneurysm-related complications[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(2): 457-462. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.008.
Aneurysm-related complications could lead to loss of a functioning arteriovenous fistula (AVF). We report our midterm and long-term results with the staple aneurysmorrhaphy technique to repair and preserve aneurysmal AVFs.We retrospectively reviewed our surgical treatment of patients with aneurysmal autogenous AVF complicated by skin erosion, bleeding, infection, pain, and difficulty with needle access from 2007 through 2014. We identified 52 patients, 40 (77%) of whom underwent repair with the staple aneurysmorrhaphy technique. The operation involved mobilizing the entire aneurysmal segments. A TA (Covidien, Norwalk, Conn) or Endo GIA (Covidien, Mansfield, Mass) stapler was used to resect the redundant aneurysm wall to create a 6- to 8-mm-diameter conduit. A subcutaneous skin flap was created after excising compromised skin. The remodeled vein was repositioned underneath the subcutaneous flap, with the staple line rotated laterally to avoid needle puncture.We attempted staple aneurysmorrhaphy in 40 patients with complicated AVF aneurysms, of which 38 repairs (95%) were successful. Median patient age was 66 years (range, 29-88 years). Median AVF age was 63 months (range, 12-136 months). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 5-81 months). At 1 year, primary patency was 67%, assisted primary patency was 88%, and secondary patency was 91%. At 2 years, primary patency was 59%, assisted primary patency was 84%, and secondary patency was 91%. At 3 years, primary patency was 46%, assisted primary patency was 69%, and secondary patency was 85%. Surgery was performed under local-regional anesthesia in 28 patients (70%) and under general anesthesia in the remaining 12 (30%). Proximal venous outflow stenoses were detected in 19 of 40 AVFs (48%) preoperatively and in 11 of 38 AVFs (29%) postoperatively. Aneurysm recurrence occurred in two repaired AVFs.Our experience with staple aneurysmorrhaphy shows that it is an effective, safe, and durable procedure to preserve a functioning autogenous AVF with complicated aneurysmal degeneration. Key principles are to reduce the vein to normal adjacent diameter and to provide healthy skin coverage. The remodeled AVF has a low aneurysm recurrence rate and maintains the beneficial properties of superior patency and low infection. It is important to aggressively monitor for and treat proximal outflow venous stenoses to prevent aneurysm recurrence. The surgery can be done safely under local anesthesia in selected patients.Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[22]
Patel MS, Street T, Davies MG, et al. Evaluating and treating venous outflow stenoses is necessary for the successful open surgical treatment of arteriovenous fistula aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(2): 444-448. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.033.
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) aneurysms (AVFAs) can lead to skin erosion, bleeding, difficult access while on hemodialysis, and poor cosmetic appearance. We reviewed our experience in treating patients with aneurysmal dilatation of their AVF.We reviewed clinical data of 48 patients (37 men; overall mean age, 55 years; range, 28-85 years) with an AVFA who underwent treatment during a 30-month period. Relevant clinical variables and treatment outcomes were analyzed.All patients underwent a fistulogram, and 90% required percutaneous angioplasty to improve outflow. Fifty-six percent of patients had one stenotic outflow lesion, and 44% had at least two tandem outflow stenoses that required treatment. Open repair with aneurysmorrhaphy was performed in one stage in 64% of patients and in two stages in 36%. A tunneled hemodialysis catheter was required in 11 patients (23%) until the surgically repaired AVF was ready for use again, comprising 10 patients treated with single-stage surgery and only one patient in the staged group. All AVFAs were effectively treated, and patients were able to maintain functional use of their access when healed.There is a high association of venous outflow stenoses and AVFA. Comprehensive therapy should encompass treatment of any venous outflow stenoses before open AVFA repair. A two-stage repair may decrease tunneled hemodialysis catheter use in patients with multiple aneurysms.Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[23]
李丽华, 叶朝阳. 血液透析病人内瘘使用与影响因素的分析[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2000, 17(3): 180-181. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2000.03.024.
[24]
Georgiadis GS, Lazarides MK, Panagoutsos SA, et al. Surgical revision of complicated false and true vascular access-related aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 47(6): 1284-1291. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.051.
This prospective observational study examined the effect of revision surgery in patients who present solely with complicated arteriovenous access (AVA)-related aneurysms.The demographics and comorbid conditions of 44 hemodialysis access patients who presented with complicated true or false AVA-related aneurysms and underwent revision surgery during a 7-year period were prospectively entered into our AVA database. Also recorded were AVA characteristics before and after revision. Arteriovenous access anatomy was evaluated preoperatively using color Doppler ultrasonography, and AVA adequacy was assessed in all patients postoperatively after the first needle puncture and every month thereafter. Postintervention access function and primary patency rates were analyzed. Patency was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups of patients with different AVA characteristics before and after revision using the log-rank test.The cases of initial AVA with complicated aneurysms comprised 16 radiocephalic, 8 brachiocephalic, 2 basilic vein transposition, and 18 prosthetic fistulas (7 and 11 of the lower and upper arm, respectively), of which 42 were dysfunctional and 2 had thrombosed early at presentation. Primary indications for revision were danger of aneurysm rupture in 26, duplication in graft aneurysm diameter in 18, painful aneurysm in 12, stenosis due to partial aneurysm thrombosis in 12, shortness of the potential cannulation area in 12, aneurysm enlargement in 4, infected aneurysm in 2, and completely thrombosed aneurysm in 2. The mean postintervention primary patencies were 93%, 82%, 57%, and 32% at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The outcomes was better in autogenous than prosthetic corrections, in true than false aneurysms, in patients with two or fewer than more than 2 previous AVAs on revised arms, and in forearm than upper-arm corrections (P =.0197, P =.004, P =.0022, and P =.0225, respectively).Surgical revision of complicated false and true AVA-related aneurysms reveals acceptable postintervention primary patency rates and therefore is justified. This outcome measure was superior in the following specific groups of corrections: autogenous were better than prosthetic, true aneurysms were better than false aneurysms, patients with one or two previous AVAs in the revised arm were better than those with more than two previous accesses in the revised arm, and finally, forearms were better than those in the upper arm.
[25]
Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, Kouhi A, et al. Surgical management of aneurismal dilation of vein and pseudoaneurysm complicating hemodialysis arteriovenuos fistula[J]. Indian J Surg, 2007, 69(6): 230-236. DOI: 10.1007/s12262-007-0032-2.
Pseudoaneurysm (PS) and aneurismal dilation of vein (ADV) are recognized complications of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in patients on hemodialysis. We present our experience about surgical management of these complications, which resulted in AVF preservation for continuing hemodialysis.Twenty-two patients underwent surgical repair of an aneurismal dilation of vein or a pseudoaneurysm arising from a native AVF. In 14 patients the aneurismal dilation of vein arose from the venous limb of AVF and in eight patients the pseudoaneurysm arose from an arteriovenous anastomotic site in the antecubital and anterior part of arm. The mean follow-up period was 15 months. Clamp Aneurysm Repair (CAR) was performed to repair the aneurismal dilation of venous limb of AVF and Tourniquet Aneurysm Repair (TAR) was performed to repair PS that arose from AVF in the antecubital and anterior part of arm.In eight of the 14 patients with aneurismal dilation of vein, who underwent CAR procedure, vascular access was preserved. In three patients with aneurismal dilation of vein in snuffbox and one in forearm, the AVF had failed due to prior venous thrombosis of AVF. In two of 14 patients, there was no need for preservation of AVF because of renal transplantation. The technical success rate and patency rate during follow up period in CAR method was 100%. In seven of eight patients with psudoaneurysm in the antecubital and anterior part of arm, who underwent TAR procedure, the AVF remained patent. The technical success rate in TAR method was 87.5%, and the patency rate was 87.5%. Overall, technical success rate was 95.45% and patency rate was 93.75%. During the 15 months of follow up period hemodialysis program through the repaired AVF sustained as desired.The surgical methods used in our study could effectively repair the aneurismal dilation of vein and psudoaneurysm arising from a native AVF, and it lead to preservation of the AVF patency for continuing hemodialysis. These methods are technically feasible, safe and cost-effective procedures. It does not require dissection and additional incision for control of the vein and artery proximal and distal to the aneurismal dilation of vein and pseudoaneurysm; result in shorter time of procedure without complications.
[26]
于青, 张郁苒, 池琦, 等. 维持性血液透析患者动静脉内瘘血管瘤样扩张的原因探讨及预防[J]. 中国血液净化, 2009, 8(6): 301-304. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2009.06.004.
[27]
王玉柱. 血液净化通路[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2008: 103-105.
[28]
Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 75(4 Suppl 2): S1-S164. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001.
The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
[29]
Almehmi A, Wang S. Partial aneurysmectomy is effective in managing aneurysm-associated complications of arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis: case series and literature review[J]. Semin Dial, 2012, 25(3): 357-364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00990.x.
[30]
Wang S, Wang MS. Successful use of partial aneurysmectomy and repair approach for managing complications of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2017, 66(2): 545-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.429.
Arteriovenous fistulas and grafts may often be associated with localized complications related to aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms, buttonholes, or structural defects that require proper management to ensure continued access functionality for hemodialysis. Partial aneurysmectomy and repair (PAR) is a targeted surgical approach specifically designed for managing these complications. The basic concepts of PAR include resecting unhealthy or excessive tissue over an access, reconstructing the vascular access lumen using in situ vascular wall or tissue when possible, and closing overlying skin with healthy margins to promote reliable healing. This report analyzes the clinical outcomes of PAR in a large clinical series.The demographic and outcome data of patients who underwent PARs at an ambulatory surgery center from 2009 to 2016 were collected and analyzed.A total of 220 PAR operations were performed in 209 patients, of which 185 had fistulas and 24 had grafts. In the fistula group, 11 patients underwent subsequent staged aneurysm repairs. Comparing the fistula group (n = 185) vs the graft group (n = 24): men were 63% vs 29%, the mean age was 60.1 ± 14.8 vs 63.9 ± 16.0 years, diabetic patients were 54% vs 75%, the mean age of the accesses at the time of repair was 5.3 ± 3.2 vs 5.0 ± 4.0 years, the upper arm accesses were 69% vs 88%, the forearm accesses were 31% vs 12%, and the mean follow-up was 27.9 ± 21.9 vs 14.0 ± 11.6 months. A pneumatic tourniquet was used during 81% of the fistula and 42% of the graft operations. Dialysis catheters were required in 2% of the patients in the fistula group and 4% in the graft group to continue hemodialysis. After repair operations, the primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency rates of the whole access conduit for the fistula group were 45%, 96%, and 98% at 1 year; 28%, 91%, and 96% at 2 years; and 19%, 87%, and 95% at 3 years, respectively. The same patency rates of the graft group were 31%, 70%, and 96% at 6 months and 10%, 57%, and 96% at 1 year, respectively. Two fistulas and one graft were lost ≤30 days postoperatively.PAR is a reliable approach for managing localized arteriovenous access complications related to aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms, buttonholes, or structural defects. Given its simplicity and reliability, we recommend PAR as a first-line choice for managing these complications of arteriovenous fistulas and a choice in selected arteriovenous graft patients.Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[31]
Rokošný S, Baláž P, Wohlfahrt P, et al. Reinforced aneurysmorrhaphy for true aneurysmal haemodialysis vascular access[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2014, 47(4): 444-450. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.01.010.
[32]
Baláž P, Rokošn ýS, Bafrnec J, et al. Repair of aneurysmal arteriovenous fistulae: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2020, 59(4): 614-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.033.
[33]
陆石, 韩国锋, 刘楠梅, 等. 手术缩窄干预透析内瘘瘤样扩张的临床研究[J]. 中国血液净化, 2015, 14(12): 746-749. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2015.12.013.
[34]
潘明明, 高民, 俞济荣, 等. 环阻法内瘘缩窄术治疗动静脉内瘘高流量致高输出量心力衰竭一例[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2019, 35(7): 532-533. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-7097.2019.07.009.
[35]
Miller GA, Goel N, Friedman A, et al. The MILLER banding procedure is an effective method for treating dialysis-associated steal syndrome[J]. Kidney Int, 2010, 77(4): 359-366. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.461.
We evaluated the efficacy of the Minimally Invasive Limited Ligation Endoluminal-Assisted Revision (MILLER) banding procedure in treating dialysis-associated steal syndrome or high-flow access problems. A retrospective analysis was conducted, evaluating banding of 183 patients of which 114 presented with hand ischemia (Steal) and 69 with clinical manifestations of pathologic high access flow such as congestive heart failure. Patients were assessed for technical success and symptomatic improvement, primary and secondary access patency, and primary band patency. Overall, 183 patients underwent a combined 229 bandings with technical success achieved in 225. Complete symptomatic relief (clinical success) was attained in 109 Steal patients and in all high-flow patients. The average follow-up time was 11 months with a 6-month primary band patency of 75 and 85% for Steal and high-flow patients, respectively. At 24 months the secondary access patency was 90% and the thrombotic event rates for upper-arm fistulas, forearm fistulas, and grafts were 0.21, 0.10, and 0.92 per access-year, respectively. Hence, the minimally invasive MILLER procedure appears to be an effective and durable option for treating dialysis access-related steal syndrome and high-flow-associated symptoms.
[36]
Kordzadeh A, D′Espiney Barbara RM, Ahmad AS, et al. Donor artery aneurysm formation following the ligation of haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula: a systematic review and case reports[J]. J Vasc Access, 2015, 16(1): 5-12. DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000297.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the pathogenesis, presentation and diagnosis of donor artery aneurysm formation following arteriovenous fistula (AVF) ligation and reach a consensus on their management.A systematic review of literature in Ovid, MedLine, Embase, Scopus and CINHAL in the English language from 1951 to 2014 was performed. This was accompanied by two case reports. A total of 12 articles with 23 case reports were identified. Variables including patient's demographics, signs, symptoms, fistula type, duration of fistula use, time to aneurysm formation, renal transplantation, diagnostic modality, aneurysm type and size, type of surgery and outcome were reviewed.The data demonstrate a male predominance (5:1) and a median age of 47 years (range, 27-75 years). The median duration of access was 54 months (range, 6-300 months). The median time from ligation to aneurysm was 120 months (range, 6-280 months). The commonest aneurysm was of the brachial artery (BA, n = 21, 84%). The commonest type of AVF was radiocephalic (n = 15, 60%) followed by brachiocephalic AVF (n = 9, 36%). The management of choice was aneurysmectomy followed by interposition vein grafting (n = 12, 50%) with a median reported patency of 12 months (range, 1-38 months). This was followed by polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafting (n = 6, 25%) with a median reported patency of 6 months (range, 1-48 months).The pathogenesis of donor artery aneurysms remains contentious. This review suggests that duplex is the investigative modality of choice and aneurysmectomy with interposition grafting is preferred over bypass.
[37]
Marzelle J, Gashi V, Nguyen HD, et al. Aneurysmal degeneration of the donor artery after vascular access[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 55(4): 1052-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.112.
This retrospective study analyzed the characteristics, potential risks, and therapeutic options of true aneurysms of the donor artery in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for dialysis access.We retrospectively collected data of patients with aneurysmal degeneration (AD) after AVF creation from surgeons who were members of the French Society for Vascular Access, treated from January 2006 to May 2011. The study excluded patients with pseudoaneurysms. Patient demographics, type of access, aneurysm characteristics, symptoms, treatment, and follow-up were recorded.Seven men and three women (mean age, 38.1 ± 5.3 years) were identified with AD (mean diameter, 44.5; range, 24-80 mm) Mean duration of access was 83.6 ± 48.8 months. Diagnosis of AD was at 117.5 ± 53.8 months after access creation. The initial access was radiocephalic, six; ulnobasilic, one; brachiocephalic, two; and brachiobasilic, one. Three patients had two successive accesses: one brachioaxillary polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft and two proximalizations of a failed radiocephalic AVF. Symptoms were pain and swelling, four; pain related to total thrombosis without signs of ischemia, two; median nerve compression, two; pain related to contained rupture, one; and subacute ischemia due to embolic occlusion of both radial and interosseous arteries, one. AD location was brachial, seven; axillary, one; radial, one; and ulnar, one. Eight patients underwent surgical aneurysm excision associated with interposition bypass using great saphenous vein, two; basilic vein, one; PTFE, three; Dacron, one; and allograft, one. Two patients needed secondary PTFE bypass because of progression of AD to the inflow artery and dilatation of the venous bypass. With a mean follow-up of 20.3 ± 17 months, all bypasses but one remained patent.AD is a rare but significant complication of vascular access. Surgical correction should be discussed in most cases due to potential complications. After resection, the choice of reconstructive conduit is not straightforward.Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
[38]
佘康, 张宪生, 尹杰, 等. 自体动静脉内瘘真性动脉瘤的个体化治疗[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(8): 715-720. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2018.08.011.
[39]
李小庭, 谢晓萍, 杨俊, 等. 自体大隐静脉移植修复瘤样扩张内瘘的方法[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2014, 14(3): 183-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2014.03.012.
[40]
Hedin U, Engström J, Roy J. Endovascular treatment of true and false aneurysms in hemodialysis access[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2015, 56(4): 599-605.
Formation of true and false aneurysms in vascular access for hemodialysis is a complication associated with an immediate or chronic threat to the patient, which jeopardizes access function for further dialysis. Although open surgical repair remains the established treatment of choice, during the last decade, endovascular procedures, largely utilizing stent grafts, have emerged as a viable option for treatment in emergencies as well as for elective cases. Here, basic concepts in vascular access aneurysm management are recapitulated and strategies for endovascular treatment of these complications discussed.
[41]
Hausegger KA, Tiessenhausen K, Klimpfinger M, et al. Aneurysms of hemodialysis access grafts: treatment with covered stents: a report of three cases[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 1998, 21(4): 334-337. DOI: 10.1007/s002709900271.
[42]
Sapoval MR, Turmel-Rodrigues LA, Raynaud AC, et al. Cragg covered stents in hemodialysis access: initial and midterm results[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1996, 7(3): 335-342. DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)72863-4.
To report midterm follow-up after implantation of covered stents for hemodialysis access.Over a 2-year period, a Cragg Endopro stent was placed in 14 patients (mean age, 66.6 years +/- 15) to treat angioplasty-induced ruptures (n = 3), pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), postangioplasty residual stenosis (n = 2), and early restenosis (n = 8, four of them in a Wallstent).Initial placement was successful in all cases. A clinical inflammatory reaction was observed in all three cases of placement in the forearm. When the covered stent was placed in a stenotic vessel, restenosis always occurred within 6 months. Primary and secondary patencies were 28.5% +/- 13.9 and 67.8% +/- 14.5, respectively, at 6 months. Covered stents were of undoubtable benefit in one case of rupture after Wallstent failure and in one case of restenosis in a Wallstent.Covered Cragg stents are effective in controlling angioplasty- induced rupture and sometimes for maintaining patency after restenosis in a Wallstent. They do not prevent restenosis and are responsible for an inflammatory reaction of unknown origin and long-term effect.
[43]
Shemesh D, Goldin I, Zaghal I, et al. Stent graft treatment for hemodialysis access aneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54(4): 1088-1094. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.252.
Aneurysms that develop in arteriovenous accesses as a result of repeated punctures are sometimes complicated by infection or ischemia causing sloughing of the overlying skin, which may endanger the access and risk major bleeding and other complications. Surgical revision may necessitate the temporary use of a central venous catheter until dialysis can be resumed via the access. We used stent grafts in selected patients for the exclusion of access aneurysms.Twenty of 63 patients requiring access revision for complication of an aneurysm from February 2005 to December 2009 underwent ambulatory endovascular stent graft deployment. Indications included signs of impending rupture, questionable viability of overlying skin, pain, infection, and limitation of cannulation sites by the size or number of the aneurysms. Endovascular treatment always included angioplasty of associated outflow or central vein stenoses at the same ambulatory session.Twenty patients with complicated access aneurysms were treated by endovascular stent graft exclusion at an average of 4.8 ± 4.3 years (range, 0.2 to 16.1 years) after access construction: nine graft pseudoaneurysms, nine native vein aneurysms, and two acute iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms. Six patients had skin erosion over the aneurysm, and 12 had painful aneurysms and clinical signs of compromised blood supply to the skin. Another two patients with an acute giant false aneurysm occurring during endovascular procedures were treated in the same interventional session by the stenting technique to control bleeding. All the aneurysms underwent endovascular exclusion without complications. Only one infected puncture site failed to heal within 2 months of stenting and was closed surgically 10 months later due to persistent localized graft infection, but with no further bleeding episodes. Only one aneurysm did not reabsorb within 3 months. Patients with painful skin ischemia had immediate pain relief. All patients also had stenosis in the draining veins necessitating additional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Only one patient required hospitalization (for intravenous antibiotic treatment of staphylococcal sepsis). No patients required a central catheter for hemodialysis. One access occluded due to cephalic arch stenosis in a noncompliant patient. Functional patency was 87% at 12 months, with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 6.3 to 55.5 months).Endovascular treatment with stent grafts in complicated access aneurysms is a simple, safe and rapid ambulatory procedure that enables treatment of both the aneurysm and its accompanying draining vein stenosis. It enables continued cannulation of the existing access and avoids the use of central catheters.Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
[44]
Shah AS, Valdes J, Charlton-Ouw KM, et al. Endovascular treatment of hemodialysis access pseudoaneurysms[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 55(4): 1058-1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.126.
Pseudoaneurysm (PSA) formation is a complication of hemodialysis access. Open repair requires PSA resection, interposition graft placement, and insertion of a catheter as a bridge. Endovascular stent graft repair is an alternative that permits immediate use of the access site. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of stent grafts for repair of arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft PSA.A retrospective review of medical records from October 2007 to March 2011 revealed 24 patients with a PSA who underwent endovascular repair using a stent graft. Indications for repair included PSA with symptoms (n = 11), PSA with skin erosion (n = 8), PSA with failed hemodialysis (n = 3), and PSA after balloon angioplasty of a stenosis (n = 2). Outcome measures were technical success, 30-day and 180-day patency, secondary interventions, and complications. All the statistical analyses were conducted by using software SAS 9.1 (SAS, SAS Institute, Gary, NC).Twenty-seven self-expanding stent grafts (Viabahn, W. L. Gore, n = 25; Fluency, Bard, n = 2) were used to treat hemodialysis access (arteriovenous graft, n = 13; arteriovenous fistula, n = 11) PSA in 24 patients (16 females; mean age, 55.7 years; mean body mass index, 28.4; mean PSA diameter, 19.5 mm). Comorbidities included hypertension (n = 22; 91.7%), diabetes mellitus (n = 8; 33.3%), and coronary artery disease (n = 4; 16.67%). The median time from access creation to repair was 455 days. The technical success rate was 100%. Balloon angioplasty of an outflow stenosis was performed in 56% of stent grafts. The 30- and 180-day patency rate was 100% and 69.2%, respectively. Three secondary interventions were performed for treatment of unrelated stenosis. Treatment failure occurred in five (18.5%) stent grafts due to infection (n = 3) and thrombosis (n = 2). Treatment of PSA with skin erosion was associated with failure due to infection (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval,.38, 66.01). The remaining 22 (81.5%) stent grafts remain patent. The mean follow-up time was 268.9 days (median, 97.5).Endovascular therapy is an effective and durable treatment option for patients with dialysis access PSAs. This technique permits immediate use of the hemodialysis access site as well as identification and treatment of associated stenosis. It may be considered as an alternative to open repair in patients who are anatomically suitable candidates.Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
[45]
王欢岚, 汪贤聪, 夏悦, 等. 血液透析患者动静脉内瘘假性动脉瘤自发性破裂1例[J]. 中国血液净化, 2014, 13(7): 546. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2014.07.018.
[46]
卢方平, 潘月娟, 姜磊. 自体动静脉内瘘动脉瘤破裂手术方案(附病例报道)[J]. 中国血液净化, 2015, 14(11): 696-697. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2015.11.014.

脚注

利益冲突 所有作者声明无利益冲突

基金

海南省医药卫生科研项目(20A200225)
PDF(4163 KB)

1892

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/