利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病合并新月体肾炎一例

郭红磊, 许雪强, 孙彬, 钱军, 杨家慧, 毛慧娟, 邢昌赢

PDF(1604 KB)
中华肾脏病杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 363-365. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20200516-00052
病例报告

利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病合并新月体肾炎一例

作者信息 +

Treatment of membranous nephropathy with crescent nephritis by rituximab: a case report

Author information +
History +

摘要

原发性膜性肾病合并新月体肾炎较为罕见,目前尚无统一治疗方案。本文报道1例仅表现为磷脂酶A2受体(PLA2R)抗体阳性的原发性膜性肾病合并新月体肾炎、急性肾衰竭病例,经糖皮质激素、血浆置换联合利妥昔单抗治疗后PLA2R抗体转阴,肾功能好转并摆脱透析。提示利妥昔单抗可显著降低PLA2R抗体水平,改善肾功能。

关键词

肾小球肾炎,膜性 / 利妥昔单抗 / 受体,磷脂酶A2 / 新月体肾炎

编辑

孙玉玲

引用本文

导出引用
郭红磊 , 许雪强 , 孙彬 , 钱军 , 杨家慧 , 毛慧娟 , 邢昌赢. 利妥昔单抗治疗膜性肾病合并新月体肾炎一例[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2021, 37(4): 363-365. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20200516-00052.
Guo Honglei , Xu Xueqiang , Sun Bin , Qian Jun , Yang Jiahui , Mao Huijuan , Xing Changying. Treatment of membranous nephropathy with crescent nephritis by rituximab: a case report[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, 2021, 37(4): 363-365. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20200516-00052.
患者女,56岁,因“反复恶心、呕吐2个月,尿量减少3 d”入院。2个月前因恶心、呕吐,在当地消化科门诊就诊,实验室检查:尿蛋白(2+),隐血(3+),Hb 105 g/L,白蛋白30.6 g/L,血肌酐及尿素氮正常,予对症治疗。入院3 d前出现尿量明显减少,24 h尿量约200 ml,门诊急查血肌酐1 904.4 μmol/L,血尿素氮48.45 mmol/L,血尿酸847 μmol/L,血总胆固醇5.71 mmol/L,白蛋白26.8 g/L,入住本院肾内科。患者自起病以来体重较前下降约2 kg。病程中无发热、关节疼痛、口腔溃疡、脱发等症状。既往史、婚育史无特殊。入院查体:贫血貌,血压156/93 mmHg,双下肢轻度水肿,余阴性。实验室检查:Hb 67 g/L,血RBC、Plt计数正常;尿蛋白(2+),尿隐血(2+);肿瘤标志物未见异常,肝炎标志物、抗核抗体、抗肾小球基底膜(GBM)抗体、抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA),Coomb's试验等结果阴性;血清磷脂酶A2受体(PLA2R)抗体 2 275.62 RU/ml(ELISA法,参考值<20 RU/ml);血气分析:pH值7.178,碱剩余-19 mmol/L;凝血功能:D-二聚体11.43 mg/L,免疫球蛋白IgG、IgA、IgM均正常,补体C3 0.82 g/L(参考值0.79 ~1.52 g/L)。入院后因无尿未能做尿液的进一步分析。胸部CT提示双肺下叶斑片影,双侧胸膜增厚。骨髓检查示:三系增生活跃,偶见原幼浆细胞。全身PET-CT未有阳性发现。入院后予以血液透析、输血浆和抗凝等对症治疗,并予甲基泼尼松龙 32 mg/d,晨顿服。
肾组织病理检查示:44个肾小球,基底膜节段增厚,未见双轨及钉突,少数肾小球球囊粘连,鲍曼囊壁破坏,见3个细胞性小新月体,1个细胞性半月体,21个细胞性新月体,18个纤维细胞性新月体。肾小管管腔见大量蛋白管型及少量红细胞管型、细胞管型、个别颗粒管型,弥漫大量炎细胞浸润,小动脉壁增厚。肾病理诊断:新月体性肾小球肾炎;膜性病变;弥漫肾小球新月体形成。见图1
图1 患者肾组织病理改变
注:A:IgG弥漫性颗粒样沉积(2+)(免疫荧光 ×400);B:C3系膜区节段样块状沉积(2+)(免疫荧光 ×400);C:IgG4基底膜节段性颗粒样沉积(+)(免疫荧光 ×400);D:PLA2R基底膜弥漫性颗粒样沉积(+)(免疫荧光 ×400);E:肾小囊腔内细胞增多,球囊周围可见炎细胞浸润,间质水肿,肾小管内可见细胞管型(HE ×400);F:大细胞纤维性新月体,挤压毛细血管袢,肾小球周围纤维化(PAS ×400);G:肾小球及肾间质纤维化(Masson ×400);H:基底膜增厚,脏层上皮细胞空泡变性,足突弥漫融合,上皮下、基底膜内电子致密物沉积(电镜 ×10 000)

Full size|PPT slide

治疗经过:根据肾病理检查结果,予500 mg/d甲基泼尼松龙冲击3 d,联合环磷酰胺(CTX)0.4 g静脉滴注1次,治疗后复查血清PLA2R抗体为1 984.52 RU/ml。同时行3次二重血浆置换后查血清PLA2R抗体为1 139.11 RU/ml。1周后再次甲基泼尼松龙200 mg冲击治疗3 d,查血清PLA2R抗体为1 597 RU/ml。续以甲基泼尼松龙32 mg/d口服维持,联合利妥昔单抗200 mg静脉滴注,间隔3周后再次利妥昔单抗100 mg静脉滴注,经过35 d的治疗,患者尿量增加至1 500 ml/24 h,血肌酐水平降至318 μmol/L,停止血液透析出院。出院后1个月复查PLA2R抗体230.14 RU/ml,血肌酐222.6 μmol/L,白蛋白31.0 g/L,尿蛋白量2.44 g/24 h。因CD19+B淋巴细胞计数<5个/mm3,未再用利妥昔单抗治疗。但1周后(启动治疗后2个月)患者出现严重肺部感染,经抗感染、无创通气等支持治疗后患者好转出院,甲基泼尼松龙16 mg/d维持。3个月后患者B淋巴细胞(CD19+)计数0.10%(2个/mm3),PLA2R抗体2.14 RU/ml,血肌酐142.9 μmol/L,白蛋白33.5 g/L,尿蛋白量2.56 g/24 h,单用甲基泼尼松龙每日12 mg维持。见图2
图2 患者治疗过程中血肌酐及PLA2R抗体水平变化
注:MP:甲基泼尼松龙;HD:血液透析;CTX:环磷酰胺;PE:血浆置换;Ritu:利妥昔单抗

Full size|PPT slide

讨论 膜性肾病合并新月体肾炎(membranous nephropathy combined with crescentic glomerulonephritis,MNCG)临床上较少见,多由抗GBM抗体、系统性红斑狼疮或ANCA相关性血管炎等引起[1]。多数患者起病急,表现为严重蛋白尿、镜下血尿,肾活检提示新月体形成,肾小球损伤,伴或不伴肾功能恶化,采用糖皮质激素联合免疫抑制剂治疗[2-3]。临床上,仅PLA2R抗体阳性的原发性MNCG尤为罕见,可能是膜性肾病的一种罕见变异型,其发病机制尚不清楚,可能有不同的新月体致病机制[1]。PLA2R是原发性膜性肾病的主要靶抗原,起关键致病作用。PLA2R抗体阳性患者肾功能恶化的发生率更高,PLA2R抗体滴度较高的患者临床缓解的可能性较低,对患者肾功能预后不良的预测更为特异。因此,需尽快降低PLA2R抗体水平。
目前尚无MNCG治疗的统一方案,临床上多采用糖皮质激素联合免疫抑制剂,如CTX、霉酚酸酯、环孢素和他克莫司等药物治疗,缓解率约为42.9%[2-3]。有学者建议MNCG治疗方案应同ANCA血管炎相关性新月体肾炎一致,需大剂量糖皮质激素冲击或联合CTX治疗[4]。近年来有用利妥昔单抗治疗MNCG的报道。与环孢素相比,利妥昔单抗治疗MNCG具有降低PLA2R抗体水平更快和不良反应更少的优点,且12个月后尿蛋白完全或部分缓解率不逊于环孢素组;24个月后尿蛋白缓解率优于环孢素组[5]。因此,利妥昔单抗已被KDIGO指南推荐用于治疗难治性原发性膜性肾病,可有效降低PLA2R抗体滴度和尿蛋白量。文献报道PLA2R抗体阳性的原发性MNCG的治疗效果不一。研究显示采用甲基泼尼松龙联合免疫抑制剂如CTX、咪唑立宾、霉酚酸酯或环孢素治疗后,患者的肾小球滤过率提高,24 h尿蛋白量显著下降[2],血清白蛋白水平明显升高[6];Lu等[7]报道1例患者接受甲基泼尼松龙冲击治疗联合血浆置换和利妥昔单抗治疗后,随访7个月,患者血肌酐由189 μmol/L降至108 μmol/L,24 h尿蛋白量由5.58 g/24 h降至0.02 g/24 h;但也有报道显示甲基泼尼松龙联合免疫抑制剂治疗效果较差,患者最终进入肾脏替代治疗[2,8]。本例患者病情较以往报道的病例病情更重,PLA2R抗体水平高达2 275.62 RU/ml,出现广泛大新月体形成和急性肾衰竭,采用血液透析、糖皮质激素冲击、CTX并血浆置换3次等治疗后,患者PLA2R抗体浓度下降,但肾功能改善不明显。采用利妥昔单抗治疗后,患者PLA2R抗体水平明显下降,伴尿量增加,血肌酐下降,提示利妥昔单抗在治疗PLA2R抗体阳性的原发性MNCG中可发挥重要作用。
本例患者在大剂量激素和CTX疗效不佳的基础上,加用CD20单抗治疗。为避免过度免疫抑制增加感染风险,我们没有按文献推荐使用标准剂量。在监测CD19+B淋巴细胞数的指导下,予以两次小剂量利妥昔单抗(分别200 mg、100 mg)治疗。患者第3次查CD19+B淋巴细胞<5个/mm3,故未再用利妥昔单抗治疗。但治疗8周后患者仍出现重症肺炎,经积极抗感染、呼吸支持和血液透析等治疗后,痊愈出院。3个月后患者PLA2R抗体转阴,血肌酐降至142.9 μmol/L,24 h尿蛋白量改善不明显,考虑虽循环中PLA2R抗体全被抑制,但肾脏组织中的免疫沉淀会持续存在于上皮下间隙直至清除,故尿蛋白的降低晚于PLA2R抗体浓度下降。
利妥昔单抗治疗可延长肾功能缓解期,并且在停用其他药物情况下不会大幅增加感染和其他严重不良事件的风险[8]。本例患者起病时PLA2R抗体水平极高,仅采用两次远远低于KDIGO指南推荐的小剂量利妥昔单抗治疗后,PLA2R抗体转阴和肾功能改善,获得很好的临床疗效。治疗中我们密切监测CD19+B淋巴细胞水平,即使两个月共300 mg的利妥昔单抗剂量,患者CD19+B淋巴细胞水平仍维持在较低水平,并出现肺部重症感染,提示需探索适合中国人群使用利妥昔单抗的有效性和安全性最佳的药物剂量。

参考文献

[1]
Basford AW, Lewis J, Dwyer JP, et al. Membranous nephropathy with crescents[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2011, 22(10): 1804-1808. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2010090923.
Membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults and can be primary or secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic infection, or drugs. Rapid decline in renal function in patients with membranous nephropathy may be due to renal vein thrombosis, malignant hypertension, or an additional superimposed destructive process involving the renal parenchyma. Crescents are rare in primary membranous nephropathy and thus suggest another underlying disease process, such as combined membranous and focal or diffuse lupus nephritis. However, in some patients with membranous nephropathy and crescents, the crescentic lesion may be due to a distinct, separate disease process, such as anti-glomerular basement membrane antibodies or anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-related pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. Here we describe a case with such renal biopsy findings, review previous reported cases, and discuss possible implications for pathogenesis of the coexistence of these lesions.
[2]
Rodriguez EF, Nasr SH, Larsen CP, et al. Membranous nephropathy with crescents: a series of 19 cases[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2014, 64(1): 66-73. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.02.018.
Membranous nephropathy (MN) with crescents is rare and, in the absence of lupus, usually is associated with anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) nephritis or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive glomerulonephritis. Only rare cases of crescentic MN without ANCA or anti-GBM have been reported.Case series.19 patients with ANCA- and anti-GBM-negative crescentic MN and no clinical evidence of systemic lupus.Clinical features, kidney biopsy findings, laboratory results, treatment, and follow-up of patients with crescentic MN.Mean age was 55 (range, 5-86) years. All patients presented with proteinuria (mean protein excretion, 11.5 [range, 3.3-29] g/d) and nearly all had hematuria; 16 of 19 (84%) patients had decreased estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs; mean serum creatinine, 2.9 [range, 0.4-10] mg/dL; mean eGFR, 39.7 [range, 4 to >100] mL/min/1.73 m2). Glomeruli showed on average 25% (range, 2%-73%) involvement by crescents. All showed a membranous pattern; 7 showed mesangial and 2 showed segmental endocapillary proliferation. By immunofluorescence, all cases showed granular subepithelial immunoglobulin G (IgG) and κ and λ light chains, and all but one showed C3; 5 showed C1q or IgA. Electron microscopy revealed stages I-III MN; 38% of cases were M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) associated, indicating that at least some were primary MN. Follow-up clinical data were available for all patients (mean, 22 [range, 1.5-138] months). 14 patients received immunosuppressive therapy, and 2, only angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy. 4 patients (21%) progressed to end-stage renal disease, at 0-9 months postbiopsy. Mean serum creatinine level of those without end-stage renal disease at follow-up was 1.7 (range, 0.5-4.1) mg/dL; mean eGFR was 53.3 (range, 16-103) mL/min/1.73 m2. 67% of patients had proteinuria with protein excretion≥1 (mean, 3.2) g/d at follow-up.Retrospective study.Crescentic MN is a rare variant of MN that usually presents with heavy proteinuria, hematuria, and decline in GFR. The prognosis is variable and the disease may respond to therapy, but most patients develop a long-term decline in GFR.Copyright © 2014 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[3]
Wang J, Zhu P, Cui Z, et al. Clinical features and outcomes in patients with membranous nephropathy and crescent formation[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(50): e2294. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002294.
[4]
Gadonski G, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE, Fervenza FC, et al. Rapidly deteriorating kidney function in a young man previously diagnosed with membranous nephropathy[J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2010, 115(2): c100-c106. DOI: 10.1159/000312872.
[5]
Fervenza FC, Appel GB, Barbour SJ, et al. Rituximab or cyclosporine in the treatment of membranous nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(1): 36-46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814427.
[6]
Saito M, Komatsuda A, Sato R, et al. Clinicopathological and long-term prognostic features of membranous nephropathy with crescents: a Japanese single-center experience[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2018, 22(2): 365-376. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-017-1465-y.
Three recent studies from the United States and China reported the clinicopathological features and short-term prognosis in patients with membranous nephropathy (MN) and crescents in the absence of secondary MN, anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibodies, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA).We compared clinicopathological and prognostic features in 16 MN patients with crescents (crescent group) and 38 MN patients without crescents (control group), in the absence of secondary MN, anti-GBM antibodies, and ANCA. Median follow-up periods in the crescent and control groups were 79 and 50 months, respectively.Decreased estimated glomerular filtration rates (<50 mL/min/1.73 m), glomerulosclerosis, and moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis were more frequently observed in the crescent group than in the control group (P = 0.043, P = 0.004, and P = 0.035, respectively). Positive staining rates for glomerular IgG2 and IgG4 were significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.032, P = 0.006, respectively). Doubling of serum creatinine during follow-up was more frequently observed in the crescent group than in the control group (P = 0.002), although approximately two-thirds of patients in the crescent group were treated with immunosuppressive therapy. Crescent formation and interstitial fibrosis were risks for doubling of serum creatinine [hazard ratio (HR) = 10.506, P = 0.012; HR = 1.140, P = 0.009, respectively].This is the first Japanese study demonstrating significant differences in clinicopathological and prognostic features between the 2 groups. Most patients in the crescent group may develop a long-term decline in renal function despite immunosuppressive therapy.
[7]
Lu H, Cui Z, Zhou XJ, et al. Plasma exchange and rituximab treatments in primary membranous nephropathy combined with crescentic glomerulonephritis: a case report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(18): e15303. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015303.
Crescent formation is rare in primary membranous nephropathy (MN). Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies are detectable in these patients. The mechanism and treatments are unknown.
[8]
Barrett CM, Troxell ML, Larsen CP, et al. Membranous glomerulonephritis with crescents[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014, 46(5): 963-971. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0593-x.
The coexistence of membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) and necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis (NCGN) is an unusual finding in a renal biopsy except in lupus nephritis. Little is known about whether these lesions are causally related in any clinical setting.We reviewed the pathology, presentation, and clinical course of 13 non-lupus patients with combined MGN and NCGN in native kidney biopsies (nine females, four males; median age 69 years), with particular attention to evidence of secondary MGN. Additional IgG subclass and phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) immunofluorescence studies were conducted in seven cases.Eight biopsies were pauci-immune other than the capillary wall deposits of MGN; one patient had a non-lupus immune complex disease, and four had mesangial deposits, including one with rare subendothelial deposits. None had anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. IgG4 was dominant or codominant in the capillary wall deposits in three cases and virtually absent in four; PLA2R was positive in two cases, and negative in five. Seven patients were judged to have secondary MGN, including five of eight ANCA+ patients. Twelve patients were treated with combinations of steroids, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, followed by durable response in seven and relentless progression to end stage renal disease in four.Secondary MGN occurs with higher frequency in ANCA-positive NCGN than in the general MGN population. A causal relationship between MGN and NCGN was not established in any patient, but circumstances suggest a common cause in several, including immune complex disease, drug reaction and paraneoplastic syndrome.

利益冲突

所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

基金

国家自然基金面上项目(81970639)
江苏省卫生和健康委员会科研项目(H2017023)
江苏省青年科学基金(BK20181085)
PDF(1604 KB)

文章所在专题

病例报告/个案经验

1097

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/