Objective To evaluate the impact of OL-HDF on in vivo removal of a wide spectrum of solutes (urea, creatinine, iPTH and β2-microglobulin) in comparison to LF-HD and HF-HD. Methods Twenty-five patients(17 men,8 women)were studied. Every patient underwent three dialysis sessions with routine HD parameters. Effects were compared among 1.8 m2 polysulfone LF-HD,1.8 m2 polysulfone HF-HD and OL-HDF. Predialysis and postdialysis solute concentrations were measured.The percentage of reduction ratios for each solute were calculated. Results Urea (molecular mass of 60 daltons)and creatinine(molecular mass of 113 daltons)reduction ratios were similar in LF-HD, HF-HD and OL-HDF. B2-microglobulim and iPTH reduction ratios for LF-HD were negligible. Mean β2-microglobalin reduction rates were 32.5%±7.0% for HF-HD versus 44.2%±10% for OL-HDF.(reinfusion volume mean 36 L/session; P < 0.05).Mean iPTH reduction rates were 42.7%±9.2% and 54.4%±8.8% for HF-HD and OL-HDF, respectively(P < 0.05).Conclusion Removal of solutes with small molecular weight is similar in three type therapies of hemopurification techniques. LF-HD does not seem to remove solutes with a molecular weight greater than 9500 daltons.OL-HDF provides marked enhancement of convection volume and enables a significant increase in β2-microglobulin and iPTH removal. β2-microaglobulin extraction is almost nil with LF-HD, better with HF-HD, and more effective with OL-HDF.