While grading the strength of recommendations and the quality of underlying evidence enhances the usefulness of clinical guidelines, the profusion of guideline grading systems undermines the value of the grading exercise. An American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) task force formulated the criteria for a grading system to be utilized in all ACCP guidelines that included simplicity and transparency, explicitness of methodology, and consistency with current methodological approaches to the grading process. The working group examined currently available systems, and ultimately modified an approach formulated by the international GRADE group. The grading scheme classifies recommendations as strong (grade 1) or weak (grade 2), according to the balance among benefits, risks, burdens, and possibly cost, and the degree of confidence in estimates of benefits, risks, and burdens. The system classifies quality of evidence as high (grade A), moderate (grade B), or low (grade C) according to factors that include the study design, the consistency of the results, and the directness of the evidence. For all future ACCP guidelines, The College has adopted a simple, transparent approach to grading recommendations that is consistent with current developments in the field. The trend toward uniformity of approaches to grading will enhance the usefulness of practice guidelines for clinicians.

The ongoing necessity for systemic heparinization is a well-known disadvantage of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT), and alternative methods of anticoagulation may be required. Our aim was to evaluate, in patients with a high risk of bleeding, the possibility of an acceptable filter life with non-anticoagulation CRRT and, in case of early filter failure, the efficacy and safety of bedside monitored regional anticoagulation with heparin and protamine.Fifty-nine patients underwent CRRT for acute renal failure (ARF) following cardiac surgery. Patients who fulfilled one of the following criteria were selected for non-anticoagulation CRRT: spontaneous bleeding, aPTT > 45 sec, thrombocytopenia and recent surgery (< 48 hr). Filter life < 24 hr without anticoagulation was the cut-off point for starting the regional anticoagulation CRRT. Heparin was infused pre-filter and protamine post-filter at an initial ratio of 1 mg protamine:100 IU heparin. The ratio was adjusted to achieve a patient aPTT < 45 sec and a circuit > 55 sec.Twenty-two (37.3%) patients had been selected for non-anticoagulation. Of them, 12 patients continued to receive non-anticoagulation (filter life: 38.3 +/- 30.5 hr) while 10 switched to regional anticoagulation (filter life: 38.6 +/- 25 hr). During regional anticoagulation no statistical difference was found between baseline aPTT (36.7 +/- 6.4 sec) and patient aPTT (41.5 +/- 12.6 sec) while circuit aPTT (77.7 +/- 43.3 sec) was significantly higher than patient aPTT (p < 0.0001). The probabilities of the circuits remaining free from clotting after 24, 48 and 72 hr were: a) non-anticoagulation: 55.5%, 30.1% and 16.6%, b) regional anticoagulation: 76.2%, 39.6% and 19.8%. There was no rebound anticoagulation observed after regional anticoagulation CRRT ended.Non-anticoagulation CRRT allowed an adequate filter life in most patients with a high risk of bleeding for prolonged aPTT and/or thrombocytopenia. Despite concerns regarding the need for careful monitoring, regional anticoagulation with heparin and protamine can be considered as a safe and valid alternative when non-anticoagulation is unsuitable because of early filter failure.

We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the efficacy of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with no anticoagulation. A standard anticoagulation protocol for CVVH, which prescribed no anticoagulation for patients at risk of bleeding, was applied to 48 critically ill patients treated with CVVH. Circuit life was prospectively observed, and the following data were obtained for each circuit: heparin use and dose, protamine use, daily prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, and platelet count. Out of 300 consecutive circuits, 143 (47.6%) received no anticoagulation, 31 (10.3%) received regional anticoagulation, and 126 received low dose heparin. No patients experienced bleeding complications secondary to CVVH. Platelet count was significantly lower in the no anticoagulation group (73 x 10(3)/microl) compared with the low dose heparin group (119 x 10(3)/microl) and the protamine group (104 x 10(3)/microl) (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). There was no significant difference in mean circuit life among the three groups (heparin, 20.9 hours; no anticoagulation, 19.3 hours; protamine, 21.2 hours; not significant). In conclusion, for a group of patients deemed to be at risk of bleeding, CVVH without anticoagulation achieved an acceptable circuit life, which was similar to that obtained in other patients with low dose heparin anticoagulation or regional anticoagulation with heparin/protamine.

Today, up to 20% of all intensive care unit patients require renal replacement therapy (RRT), and continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) are the preferred technique. In CRRT, effective anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit is mandatory to prevent clotting of the circuit or filter and to maintain filter performance. At present, a variety of systemic and regional anticoagulation modes for CRRT are available. Worldwide, unfractionated heparin is the most widely used anticoagulant. All systemic techniques are associated with significant adverse effects. Most important are bleeding complications and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT-II). Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is a safe and effective technique. Compared to systemic anticoagulation, RCA prolongs filter running times, reduces bleeding complications, allows effective control of acid-base status, and reduces adverse events like HIT-II. In this review, we will discuss systemic and regional anticoagulation techniques for CRRT including anticoagulation for patients with HIT-II. Today, RCA can be recommended as the therapy of choice for the majority of critically ill patients requiring CRRT.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and safety of citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients by performing a meta-analysis of updated evidence.Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible studies, and manual searches were also performed to identify additional trials. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for CRRT were considered eligible for inclusion.Eleven RCTs with 992 patients and 1998 circuits met the inclusion criteria. Heparin was regionally delivered in two trials and systemically delivered in nine trials. Citrate for CRRT significantly reduced the risk of circuit loss compared to regional (HR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.35–0.77, P = 0.001) and systemic (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.59–0.98, P = 0.04) heparin. Citrate also reduced the incidence of filter failure (RR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.50–0.98, P = 0.04). The citrate group had a significantly lower bleeding risk than the systemic heparin group (RR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.21–0.60, P < 0.001) and a similar bleeding risk to the regional heparin group (RR 0.34, 95 % CI 0.01–8.24, P = 0.51). The incidences of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and hypocalcemia were increased in the heparin and citrate groups, respectively. No significant survival difference was observed between the groups.Given the lower risk of circuit loss, filter failure, bleeding, and HIT, regional citrate should be considered a better anticoagulation method than heparin for CRRT in critically ill patients without any contraindication.

During extracorporeal dialysis, some anticoagulation strategy is necessary to prevent the coagulation of blood. Heparin has historically been used as an anticoagulant because of its efficacy combined with low cost. However, a variable incidence of hemorrhagic complications (5-30%) has been documented in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with heparin as an anticoagulant. Citrate has anticoagulation properties secondary to its ability to chelate calcium, which is necessary for the coagulation cascade. Citrate may thus be used in a regional anticoagulation (RCA), limited to the extracorporeal circuit of CRRT, to avoid systemic anticoagulation. Recent meta-analysis confirmed the advantage of RCA over heparin in terms of incidence of bleeding during CRRT. Moreover, an increase in filter lifespan is documented, with a secondary advantage in reaching the prescribed dialysis dose. In our experience, we could confirm this positive effect. In fact, with a progressive increase in the proportion of CRRT with citrate as RCA, we obtained a reduction in the number of filters used for every 72 h of treatment (from 2.4 in 2011 to 1.3 in 2015), and most importantly, a reduction in the difference between the prescribed and delivered dialysis doses (from 22 to 7%). Citrate has an intense effect on the acid-base balance as well, if fully metabolized through the Krebs cycle, due to the production of bicarbonate. Even more severely ill patients, such as those with liver dysfunction, may be treated with RCA without severe complications, because modern machines for CRRT are equipped with simple systems that are able to manage the citrate infusion and control the calcium levels, with minimal risks of metabolic derangements.© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Although current guidelines suggest the use of regional citrate anticoagulation (which involves the addition of a citrate solution to the blood before the filter of the extracorporeal dialysis circuit) as first-line treatment for continuous kidney replacement therapy in critically ill patients, the evidence for this recommendation is based on few clinical trials and meta-analyses.To determine the effect of regional citrate anticoagulation, compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation, on filter life span and mortality.A parallel-group, randomized multicenter clinical trial in 26 centers across Germany was conducted between March 2016 and December 2018 (final date of follow-up, January 21, 2020). The trial was terminated early after 596 critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury or clinical indications for initiation of kidney replacement therapy had been enrolled.Patients were randomized to receive either regional citrate anticoagulation (n = 300), which consisted of a target ionized calcium level of 1.0 to 1.40 mg/dL, or systemic heparin anticoagulation (n = 296), which consisted of a target activated partial thromboplastin time of 45 to 60 seconds, for continuous kidney replacement therapy.Coprimary outcomes were filter life span and 90-day mortality. Secondary end points included bleeding complications and new infections.Among 638 patients randomized, 596 (93.4%) (mean age, 67.5 years; 183 [30.7%] women) completed the trial. In the regional citrate group vs systemic heparin group, median filter life span was 47 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 19-70 hours) vs 26 hours (IQR, 12-51 hours) (difference, 15 hours [95% CI, 11 to 20 hours]; P < .001). Ninety-day all-cause mortality occurred in 150 of 300 patients vs 156 of 296 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimator percentages, 51.2% vs 53.6%; unadjusted difference, -2.4% [95% CI, -10.5% to 5.8%]; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72 to 1.13]; unadjusted P = .38; adjusted difference, -6.1% [95% CI, -12.6% to 0.4%]; primary adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.004]; primary adjusted P = .054). Of 38 prespecified secondary end points, 34 showed no significant difference. Compared with the systemic heparin group, the regional citrate group had significantly fewer bleeding complications (15/300 [5.1%] vs 49/296 [16.9%]; difference, -11.8% [95% CI, -16.8% to -6.8%]; P < .001) and significantly more new infections (204/300 [68.0%] vs 164/296 [55.4%]; difference, 12.6% [95% CI, 4.9% to 20.3%]; P = .002).Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy, anticoagulation with regional citrate, compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation, resulted in significantly longer filter life span. The trial was terminated early and was therefore underpowered to reach conclusions about the effect of anticoagulation strategy on mortality.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02669589.

To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of fixed-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) with adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin as anticoagulant for continuous hemofiltration.Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.University-affiliated adult intensive care unitAll patients requiring continuous hemofiltration for acute renal failure or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were eligible. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Eleven were excluded, seven because of major protocol violations and four died before hemofiltration.Patients received continuous venovenous hemodialysis with filtration with prefilter replacement at 500 mL/hr and countercurrent dialysate at 1000 mL/hr. Filters were primed with normal saline containing anticoagulant. Dalteparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 20 units/kg and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr. Heparin-treated patients received a commencement bolus of 2000-5000 units and a maintenance infusion at 10 units/kg/hr, titrated to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time in the patient of 70-80 secs.The primary outcome measure--time to failure of the hemofilter--was compared using survival analysis. Twenty-two patients (13 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to heparin. Twenty-five patients (16 with acute renal failure and nine with SIRS; total, 41 filters) were randomized to dalteparin. Mean (SE) activated partial thromboplastin time in the heparin group was 79 (4.3) secs. Mean (SE) anti-factor-Xa activity in the six patients given dalteparin who were assayed was 0.49 (0.07). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration platelet count was 225 (35.5) x 10(9) for heparin and 178 (18.1) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p =.24, unpaired Student's t-test). Mean (SE) prehemofiltration hemoglobin was 11.4 (0.61) g/dL for heparin and 10.6 (0.38) g/dL for dalteparin (p =.31, unpaired Student's t-test).There was no significant difference in the time to failure between the two groups (p =.75, log rank test). For dalteparin, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) mean (SE) time to failure of the hemofilter was 46.8 (5.03) hrs. For heparin, K-M mean (SE) time to failure was 51.7 (7.51) hrs. The 95% CI for difference in mean time to failure was -13 to 23 hrs. The power of this study to detect a 50% change in filter life was >90%.Mean (SE) reduction in platelet count during hemofiltration was 63 (25.8) x 10(9) for heparin and 41.8 (26.6) x 10(9) for dalteparin (p =.57, unpaired Student's t-test). Eight patients given dalteparin and four patients given heparin had screening for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; three of the dalteparin patients and one of the heparin patients were positive (p = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). There were three episodes of trivial bleeding and two episodes of significant bleeding for dalteparin, and there were three episodes of trivial bleeding and four episodes of significant bleeding for heparin (p =.53, chi-square test). The mean (SE) decrease in hemoglobin concentration during hemofiltration was 0.51 (0.54) g/dL for heparin and 0.28 (0.49) g/dL for dalteparin (p =.75, unpaired Student's t-test). The mean (SE) packed-cell transfusion volume during hemofiltration was 309 (128) mL for heparin and 290 (87) mL for dalteparin (p =.90, unpaired Student's t-test). Daily costs, including coagulation assays, of hemofiltration were approximately 10% higher using dalteparin than with heparin.Fixed-dose dalteparin provided identical filter life, comparable safety, but increased total daily cost compared with adjusted-dose heparin. Unfractionated heparin remains our anticoagulant of choice for continuous hemofiltration in intensive care.

The study was designed to assess a practical mode of postdilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) using a calcium-containing replacement solution, and to compare it with a CVVH mode with no anticoagulation (NA). Both methods were employed in our center for acute kidney injury (AKI) patients at high risk of bleeding. Fifty-six patients were equally allocated into the RCA-CVVH group and the NA-CVVH group. The study displayed no significant differences between groups involving baseline characteristics, severity level, blood gas analysis, hepatic/renal/coagulative functions, electrolytes, hemoglobin concentration, and platelet counts before or after continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Compared to the NA-CVVH group, the RCA-CVVH group had a lower level of transfused packed red blood cells and platelet as well as a longer filter lifespan. The result showed no substantial differences between groups in terms of the mean supporting time and cost involving CRRT per person, the length of ICU and hospital stays, and the ICU survival. Homeostasis was basically preserved at a target range during the RCA post-CVVH procedure. Serious complications did not arise during the RCA process. RCA postdilutional CVVH is a safe and effective mode for application in AKI patients with a high risk of bleeding, and it can extend the filter lifespan and decrease blood loss, compared with the NA mode for CRRT. Further studies are needed to evaluate this mode for CRRT. (Retrospective Registration number ChiCTR1800016462, Registration date 2/6/2018).

To determine whether regional anticoagulation of continuous renal replacement therapy circuits using citrate and calcium prolongs circuit life and/or affects circulating cytokine levels compared with regional anticoagulation using heparin and protamine.Multicenter, parallel group randomized controlled trial.Seven ICUs in Australia and New Zealand.Critically ill adults requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.Patients were randomized to receive one of two methods of regional circuit anticoagulation: citrate and calcium or heparin and protamine.The primary outcome was functional circuit life measured in hours, assessed using repeated events survival analysis. In addition, we measured changes in interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10 blood levels. We randomized 212 subjects who were treated with 857 continuous renal replacement therapy circuits (median 2 circuits per patient [interquartile range, 1-6], 390 in citrate group vs 467 in heparin group). The groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Patients receiving regional continuous renal replacement therapy anticoagulation with heparin and protamine were more likely to experience circuit clotting than those receiving citrate and calcium (hazard ratio, 2.03 [1.36-3.03]; p < 0.0005; 857 circuits). The median lifespan of the first study circuit in each patient was 39.2 hours (95% CI, 32.1-48.0 hr) in the citrate and calcium group versus 22.8 hours (95% CI, 13.3-34.0 hr) in the heparin and protamine group (log rank p = 0.0037, 204 circuits). Circuit anticoagulation with citrate and calcium had similar effects on cytokine levels compared with heparin and protamine anticoagulation. There were more adverse events in the group assigned to heparin and protamine anticoagulation (11 vs 2; p = 0.011).Regional citrate and calcium anticoagulation prolongs continuous renal replacement therapy circuit life compared with regional heparin and protamine anticoagulation, does not affect cytokine levels, and is associated with fewer adverse events.

Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a commonly experienced complication; the pathology is not always easily understood. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) provides a method to dialyze unstable critically ill patients. We hypothesized that CRRT may precipitate a form of thrombocytopenia. In trials thrombocytopenia occurred at rates as high as 70%. The etiology remains unknown and results in additional diagnostic workup, as well as possible drug therapy. The extent, duration and temporal relation of thrombocytopenia remain to be determined.Identify a pattern in platelet fluctuations after the initiation of CRRT and its impact on health care.A retrospective study was conducted in patients receiving CRRT for >24 h with no pre-existing thrombocytopenia. Patients initiated on CRRT had daily platelet counts monitored, and CRRT attributes and therapeutic interventions were collected. Platelets were assessed for time to nadir, degree of decline and time to return to baseline after discontinuation of CRRT.Forty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven percent of patients receiving heparinoids were tested for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), during CRRT, with 39% of these patients having therapy changed to non-heparinoid agents due to suspected HIT; no HIT antibodies were positive. Eleven patients (22%) receiving anticoagulants, prophylactically or therapeutically had them held for a drop in platelets. There was a mean decline in platelets of 48% with a mean of 4.6 days to the nadir. An average 2.48 days were observed until rebound to >150 × 10(3)/mm(3). Statistical analysis failed to identify any patient attributes that correlated with the probability of thrombocytopenia.CRRT appears to be associated with a drop in platelets within the first 5 days of therapy with an average decline of 48%. However, platelets appear to return to >150 × 10(3)/mm(3) after cessation of CRRT. This fluctuation should be considered in the setting of patients developing thrombocytopenia after initiation of CRRT.

We update recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines, and address 3 new topics.We generate strong (Grade 1) and weak (Grade 2) recommendations based on high- (Grade A), moderate- (Grade B), and low- (Grade C) quality evidence.For VTE and no cancer, as long-term anticoagulant therapy, we suggest dabigatran (Grade 2B), rivaroxaban (Grade 2B), apixaban (Grade 2B), or edoxaban (Grade 2B) over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy, and suggest VKA therapy over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Grade 2C). For VTE and cancer, we suggest LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B), dabigatran (Grade 2C), rivaroxaban (Grade 2C), apixaban (Grade 2C), or edoxaban (Grade 2C). We have not changed recommendations for who should stop anticoagulation at 3 months or receive extended therapy. For VTE treated with anticoagulants, we recommend against an inferior vena cava filter (Grade 1B). For DVT, we suggest not using compression stockings routinely to prevent PTS (Grade 2B). For subsegmental pulmonary embolism and no proximal DVT, we suggest clinical surveillance over anticoagulation with a low risk of recurrent VTE (Grade 2C), and anticoagulation over clinical surveillance with a high risk (Grade 2C). We suggest thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism with hypotension (Grade 2B), and systemic therapy over catheter-directed thrombolysis (Grade 2C). For recurrent VTE on a non-LMWH anticoagulant, we suggest LMWH (Grade 2C); for recurrent VTE on LMWH, we suggest increasing the LMWH dose (Grade 2C).Of 54 recommendations included in the 30 statements, 20 were strong and none was based on high-quality evidence, highlighting the need for further research.Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. All rights reserved.

To prevent thromboembolic events associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), patients usually are treated with argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies to comparing the treatment of HIT with the following direct thrombin inhibitor: argatroban versus lepirudin and argatroban versus bivalirudin. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database for relevant studies. The clinical outcomes were thromboembolic complication and bleeding. A total of 589 articles were found and 9 of which were finally included in this meta-analysis. There were no significantly differences of thromboembolic complication between argatroban and hirudin analogues (lepirudin and bivalirudin) in the treatment of HIT (lepirudin: RR = 0.773, 95% CI = 0.449-1.331, P = 0.353; bivalirudin: RR = 0.768, 95% CI = 0.386-1.527, P = 0.452). Moreover, the incidence of clinical bleeding of argatroban was similar to hirudin analogues (lepirudin: RR = 0.755, 95% CI = 0.531-1.073, P = 0.117; bivalirudin: RR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.673-1.472, P = 0.981). Current evidences show that argatroban has the similar effectiveness and safety with lepirudin and bivalirudin for defending against HIT.

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for continuous renal replacement therapy is widely used in intensive care units (ICUs). However, concern exists about the safety of citrate in patients with liver failure (LF). The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of RCA in ICU patients with varying degrees of impaired liver function.

We determined the effect of regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill subjects suffering from acute renal failure who were not at high risk for hemorrhagic complications.Between April 1999 and June 2002, 30 critically ill subjects requiring continuous renal replacement therapy and using 79 hemofilters were randomly assigned to receive regional citrate or systemic heparin anticoagulation.The median hemofilter survival time was 124.5 hours (95% CI 95.3 to 157.4) in the citrate group, which was significantly longer than the 38.3 hours (95% CI 24.8 to 61.9) in the heparin group (P < 0.001). Increasing illness severity score, male gender, and decreasing antithrombin-III levels were independent predictors of an increased relative hazard of hemofilter failure. After adjustment for illness severity, antithrombin-III levels increased significantly more over the period of study in the citrate as compared to the heparin group (P= 0.038). Moreover, after adjustment for antithrombin-III levels and illness severity score, the relative risk of hemorrhage with citrate anticoagulation was significantly lower than that with heparin (relative risk of 0.14; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.96, P= 0.05).Compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation significantly increases hemofilter survival time, and significantly decreases bleeding risk in critically ill patients suffering from acute renal failure and requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is applied in critically ill patients with acute renal failure for renal replacement. Heparins used to prevent circuit clotting may cause bleeding. Regional anticoagulation with citrate reduces bleeding, but has metabolic risks. The aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two.Randomized, nonblinded, controlled single-center trial.General intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.Adult critically ill patients needing CVVH for acute renal failure and without an increased bleeding risk.Regional anticoagulation with citrate or systemic anticoagulation with the low-molecular weight heparin nadroparin.End points were adverse events necessitating discontinuation of study anticoagulant, transfusion, metabolic and clinical outcomes, and circuit survival. Of the 215 randomized patients, 200 received CVVH per protocol (97 citrate and 103 nadroparin). Adverse events required discontinuation of citrate in two patients (accumulation and clotting) of nadroparin in 20 (bleeding and thrombocytopenia) (p < 0.001). Bleeding occurred in 6 vs. 16 patients (p = 0.08). The median number of red blood cell units transfused per CVVH day was 0.27 (interquartile range, 0.0-0.63) for citrate, 0.36 (interquartile range, 0-0.83) for nadroparin (p = 0.31). Citrate conferred less metabolic alkalosis (p = 0.001) and lower plasma calcium (p < 0.001). Circuit survival was similar. Three-month mortality on intention-to-treat was 48% (citrate) and 63% (nadroparin) (p = 0.03), per protocol 45% and 62% (p = 0.02). Citrate reduced mortality in surgical patients (p = 0.007), sepsis (p = 0.01), higher Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.006), and lower age (p = 0.009).The efficacy of citrate and nadroparin anticoagulation for CVVH was similar, however, citrate was safer. Unexpectedly, citrate reduced mortality. Less bleeding could only partly explain this benefit, less clotting could not. Post hoc citrate appeared particularly beneficial after surgery, in sepsis and severe multiple organ failure, suggesting interference with inflammation.

Citrate anticoagulation is an excellent alternative to heparin anticoagulation for critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. In this article, we provide a safe and an easy-to-handle citrate anticoagulation protocol with variable treatment doses and excellent control of the acid-base status.Prospective observational study.University hospital.One hundred sixty-two patients with acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy were enrolled in the study.A continuous venovenous hemodialysis-based citrate anticoagulation protocol using a 4% trisodium solution, a specially designed dialysate fluid, and a continuous calcium infusion were used. The study period was 6 days. Hemofilters were changed routinely after 72 hours of treatment. The patients were grouped according to body weight, with patients below 60 kg body weight in group 1, patients with at least 60 kg and up to 90 kg body weight in group 2, and patients with a body weight of above 90 kg in group 3. Dialysate flow was adapted according to body size and matched approximately 2 L/hr for a patient with average body size. Blood flow, citrate flow, and calcium flow were adjusted according to the dialysate flow used.Median filter run time was 61.5 hours (interquartile range: 34.5-81.1 hours). Only 5% of all hemofilters had to be changed because of clotting. The prescribed treatment dose was achieved in all patients. Acid-base and electrolyte control were excellent in all groups. In the rare cases of metabolic disarrangement during citrate anticoagulation, acid-base values were rapidly corrected by modifying either the dialysate flow or alternatively the blood flow rate. Eight patients (5%) developed signs of citrate accumulation indicated by an increase of the total calcium >3 mmol/L or a need for high calcium substitution.We provide a safe and an easy-to-handle citrate anticoagulation protocol that allows an excellent acid-base and electrolyte control in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. The protocol can be adapted to patients' need, allowing a wide spectrum of treatment doses.

This study aimed to investigate whether effluent ionized calcium was an appropriate indicator to assess anticoagulant effect in continuous renal replacement therapy with regional citrate anticoagulation instead of post-filter ionized calcium.In total, 48 paired samples of effluent fluid and post-filter blood were obtained from critically ill patients who required continuous renal replacement therapy. All samples were taken for ionized calcium measurements and were assessed by point-of-care analyzer. Correlations and agreements between two methods were performed by Pearson linear analysis and Bland-Altman analysis accordingly.The mean post-filter ionized calcium was 0.42 ± 0.12 mmol/L, and mean ionized calcium level of effluent fluid was 0.39 ± 0.11 mmol/L. The ionized calcium level of effluent fluid was significantly correlated with post-filter ionized calcium in all continuous renal replacement therapy patients. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean difference of ionized calcium between two sampling sites in all continuous renal replacement therapy patients was -0.02 mmol/L with 95% confidence interval ranging from -0.09 to 0.04 mmol/L. The significant correlations and agreements were also demonstrated in continuous veno-venous hemofiltration, continuous veno-venous hemodialysis, and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration modalities separately.The effluent ionized calcium could be a considerable substitute for post-filter ionized calcium to monitor the validity of regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy with less blood loss.

The objective of this study was to elucidate the most practical and effective laboratory measurement for monitoring citrate in critically ill patients undergoing citrate-anticoagulated continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH).This observational study was performed at the mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit of a regional teaching hospital. The study population comprised ten consecutive critically ill patients with acute renal failure and indication for haemofiltration with the use of regional anticoagulation with citrate. Serum samples for the measurement of citrate and total and ionised calcium were taken from the pre- and post-filter compartments and from the arterial circulation of patients during citrate-anticoagulated CVVH.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that for detecting citrate overdose (defined as a citrate concentration >1.0 mmol/L) the best cut-off limits for total/ionised calcium and ionised calcium were 2.1 and 0.8 mmol/L, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off limit of 2.1 for total/ionised calcium were 89% and 100%, and 84% and 100%, respectively, for the cut-off limit of 0.8 mmol/L for ionised calcium.In patients without liver insufficiency, total/ionised calcium performed slightly better than ionised calcium in detecting elevated citrate concentrations. However, because of the simplicity of its measurement, ionised calcium is preferred. Measurement of citrate is not necessary.

Different methods of regional anticoagulation using citrate in continuous hemofiltration have been described. To date, only such surrogate parameters as pH, anion gap, total calcium concentration, or total calcium-ionized calcium ratio have been proposed to reflect increased plasma citrate levels and thus risk for side effects. However, none of these parameters has been correlated with plasma citrate levels in critically ill patients.Sixteen patients were treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and citrate anticoagulation for a mean of 13 +/- 9 days. Citrate levels were measured every other day, and correlations were calculated with the mentioned parameters.Steady-state citrate levels on treatment day 3 were 16.39 +/- 15.77 mg/dL (range, 2.63 to 73.49 mg/dL [853 +/- 821 micromol/L; range, 137 to 3825 micromol/L]). The highest correlation was found between citrate plasma level and total calcium-ionized calcium ratio (R = 0.85; P < 0.001). pH (R = -0.15) and anion gap (R = 0.36) were not helpful in estimating citrate plasma levels in patients treated with citrate-CVVH.Calculating total calcium-ionized calcium ratio is a simple tool that correlates best with citrate plasma levels. We recommend close monitoring of this parameter in all patients administered high doses of citrate as part of regional anticoagulation protocols.

Ionized calcium (iCa) concentration is often used in critical care and measured using blood gas analyzers at the point of care. Controlling and adjusting regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) involves measuring the iCa concentration in two samples: systemic with physiological iCa concentrations and post filter samples with very low iCa concentrations. However, modern blood gas analyzers are optimized for physiological iCa concentrations which might make them less suitable for measuring low iCa in blood with a high concentration of citrate. We present results of iCa measurements from six different blood gas analyzers and the impact on clinical decisions based on the recommendations of the dialysis’ device manufacturer.

During the course of acute kidney injury (AKI) patients may require renal replacement therapy (RRT). The preferred therapeutic measure for such patients is continuous RRT (CRRT). Anticoagulation is required to prevent clotting of the extracorporeal circuit. The actual KDIGO guidelines recommend citrate as the first line anticoagulant.Citrate dose infused into the extracorporeal circuit should achieve an extracorporeal calcium concentration of 0.2 - 0.3 mmol/L. Here, we evaluated two blood gas analysers for their ability of covering the calcium concentration range needed for CRRT (Radiometer ABL 835; Instrumentation Laboratory GEM 4000). Measurements of iCa from 0.2 to 3.0 mmol/L were performed in aqueous 0.9% NaCl solutions with and without human serum albumin (HAS) and also in patient samples.Using the GEM analyser, differences of measured results to target values were low throughout the whole concentration range. Using the ABL system, the difference increased with lower target values and exceeded up to 60% at 0.2 mmol/L. The results were reproduced in patient samples.Measuring Ca2+ concentrations could result in an overdosing or underdosing of citrate when using an analytical method which is different to the instrument used initially to achieve the recommended concentrations. If measurement of the new method results in lower Ca2+ concentration and, therefore, reduced anticoagulation by citrate infusion this could lead to more clotting events. Overestimation of the calcium concentration by the new method in the extracorporeal circuit would result in an increased citrate dose delivered to the patient, leading to in vivo hypocalcemia and a pronouncement of citrate induced acid base derangements. Therefore, to monitor Ca2+ concentrations in CRRT during citrate anticoagulation, specific target values for each individual instrument must be established.

Variable ionized calcium measurements in post filter blood samples during continuous renal replacement therapy (renal dialysis) using regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) have been reported using commercial blood gas analyzers, resulting in analyzer-dependent differences in decisions regarding adjustment of citrate dose.We evaluated accuracy for measurement of iCa at low concentrations by 4 commercial blood gas analyzers using primary reference solutions formulated down to 0.15mmol/l iCa.Of the 4 analyzers tested, GEM Premier 4000 demonstrates acceptable accuracy for iCa measurement with a median deviation of -6.7% (-0.01mmol/l) at 0.15mmol/l, while other analyzers tested show increasingly positive biases from +40% (+0.06mmol/l) to +60% (+0.09mmol/l) relative to target. These relative differences are consistent with discordant results reported for measurement of iCa in blood during RCA. Interference from sodium with measured iCa and carryover from system rinse solution to sample are likely contributors to variability.We conclude the GEM Premier 4000 shows acceptable accuracy for measuring iCa at low concentrations required to control citrate dose during RCA. The method presented here may be used to test accuracy of any blood gas analyzer prior to use in clinical applications requiring measurement of iCa at low concentrations.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is not widely used because it requires complex therapeutic modalities, a specialized calcium-free replacement solution, and continuous intravenous calcium infusion. We designed a simplified protocol for RCA using a commercial calcium-containing replacement solution for continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Thirty-six patients were treated with RCA-based pre-dilution CVVH using a calcium-containing replacement solution (ionized calcium 1.50 mmol/L). We pumped a 4 % trisodium citrate solution into the arterial line of extracorporeal circulation at a starting rate of 200 mL/h while adjusting the rate to achieve a post-filter ionized calcium level of between 0.25 and 0.5 mmol/L. The initial blood flow was set at 150 mL/min. The replacement solution was delivered at 35 mL/kg/h. We measured the serum and effluent citrate concentration during CVVH at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. The mean hemofilter survival was 61.3 ± 21.6 h (range 14-122 h). The mean 4 % trisodium citrate solution pumped was 207 (190-230) mL/h, and the mean pre-filter and post-filter ionized calcium levels were 0.96-1.02 and 0.34-0.38 mmol/L, respectively. Ninety-two, 63, and 48 % of the hemofilters were patent at 24, 48, and 72 h. The mean serum citrate concentration was not significantly different at 24, 48, and 72 h. No bleeding episodes were found, and no patient showed the symptoms and signs of hypocalcemia or citrate toxicity. Our simplified RCA protocol using a calcium-containing replacement solution for CVVH is effective and safe, and obviates the need for a separate peripheral or central venous catheter for continuous intravenous calcium infusion.

Since 2012, citrate anticoagulation is the recommended anticoagulation strategy for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The main drawback using citrate as anticoagulant compared with heparin is the need for calcium replacement and the rigorous control of calcium levels. This study investigated the possibility to achieve anticoagulation while eliminating the need for calcium replacement. This was successfully achieved by including citrate and calcium in all CRRT solutions. Thereby the total calcium concentration was kept constant throughout the extracorporeal circuit, whereas the ionized calcium was kept at low levels enough to avoid clotting. Being a completely new concept, only five patients with acute renal failure were included in a short, prospective, intensely supervised nonrandomized pilot study. Systemic electrolyte levels and acid-base parameters were stable and remained within physiologic levels. Ionized calcium levels declined slightly initially but stabilized at 1.1 mmol/L. Plasma citrate concentrations stabilized at approximately 0.6 mmol/L. All postfilter ionized calcium levels were <0.5 mmol/L, that is, an anticoagulation effect was reached. All filter pressures were normal indicating no clotting problems, and no visible clotting was observed. No calcium replacement was needed. This pilot study suggests that it is possible to perform regional citrate anticoagulation without the need for separate calcium infusion during CRRT.

&lt;b&gt;<i>Background/Aims:</i>&lt;/b&gt; Recent updates to the Nikkiso Aquarius continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) platform allowed us to develop a post-dilution protocol for regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) using standard bicarbonate buffered, calcium containing replacement solution with acid citrate dextrose formula-A as a citrate source. Our objective was to demonstrate that the protocol was safe and effective. &lt;b&gt;<i>Methods:</i>&lt;/b&gt; Prospective audit of consecutive patients receiving RCA for CRRT within intensive care unit, who were either contraindicated to heparin or had poor filter lifespan (&lt;12 h for 2 consecutive filters) on heparin. &lt;b&gt;<i>Results:</i>&lt;/b&gt; We present the first 29 patients who used 98 filters. After excluding ‘non-clot' filter loss, 50% had a duration of &gt;27 h. Calcium supplementation was required for 30 (30%) filter circuits, in 17 of 29 (58%) patients. One patient discontinued the treatment due to metabolic alkalosis, but there were no adverse bleeding events. &lt;b&gt;<i>Conclusion:</i>&lt;/b&gt; Post-dilution RCA system is effective and simple to use on the Aquarius platform and results in comparable filter life for patients relatively contraindicated to heparin.

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is used as an anticoagulant for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). A systemic calcium (Ca2+) infusion is required to replace Ca2+ lost in the effluent. The shortage of intravenous Ca2+ in the United States has limited RCA use. We describe a continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) protocol with RCA using 2.2% anticoagulant citrate dextrose formula-A (ACD-A) and a commercial dialysate containing Ca2+ 1.5 mmol/l (N × Stage) as post-filter replacement fluid (RF), without need for Ca2+ infusion.We prospectively evaluated five patients on CRRT who had at least three episodes of filter clotting within 24 h. Patients were switched to CVVH using ACD-A infused pre-blood pump and titrated to achieve a post-filter ionized calcium (iCa2+) level <0.5 mmol/l. The Ca2+ -containing dialysate was delivered post-filter as RF.Steady state mean serum chemistries were: Na+: 140.8 ± 2.3 meq/l, K+: 4.2 ± 0.4 meq/l, HCO3-: 30.9 ± 3.7 meq/l, pH: 7.42 ± 0.07, CO2: 47.9 ± 8.3 mmHg, total Ca2+: 8.08 ± 1.09 mg/dL. Post-filter iCa2+ ranged 0.27-0.36 mmol/l, and patient iCa2+ ranged 0.81-1.24 mmol/l. Mean post-filter RF rate: 3086 ± 164 ml/h, mean ACD-A rate: 298 ± 21 ml/h. Mean blood flow rate: 200 ± 17 ml/min, mean filtration fraction: 39.6 ± 7.2%. Mean effluent flow rate: 38.6 ± 6.7 ml/kg/h (range 28.7-55.8). Mean filter survival was 7 h without anticoagulation, compared to 42.6 h in the ACD-A group (p<0.0001).In this pilot study, CVVH using ACD-A for RCA and a Ca2+ -containing RF was safely and effectively used without a continuous Ca2+ infusion. This protocol is a promising solution for maintaining effective CRRT when intravenous calcium is in short supply.

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is the preferred mode of anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Conventional RCA‐CRRT citrate dose ranges from 3 to 5 mmol/L of blood. This study explored the effectiveness of an RCA protocol with lower citrate dose and its impact on citrate‐related complications.

Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients, even in those without diabetes mellitus. Aggressive glycemic control may reduce mortality in this population. However, the relationship between mortality, the control of hyperglycemia, and the administration of exogenous insulin is unclear.To determine whether blood glucose level or quantity of insulin administered is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill patients.Single-center, prospective, observational study of 531 patients (median age, 64 years) newly admitted over the first 6 months of 2002 to an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in a UK national referral center for cardiorespiratory surgery and medicine.The primary end point was intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Secondary end points were hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and predicted threshold glucose level associated with risk of death.Of 531 patients admitted to the ICU, 523 underwent analysis of their glycemic control. Twenty-four-hour control of blood glucose levels was variable. Rates of ICU and hospital mortality were 5.2% and 5.7%, respectively; median lengths of stay were 1.8 (interquartile range, 0.9-3.7) days and 6 (interquartile range, 4.5-8.3) days, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that increased administration of insulin was positively and significantly associated with ICU mortality (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04] at a prevailing glucose level of 111-144 mg/dL [6.1-8.0 mmol/L] for a 1-IU/d increase), suggesting that mortality benefits are attributable to glycemic control rather than increased administration of insulin. Also, the regression models suggest that a mortality benefit accrues below a predicted threshold glucose level of 144 to 200 mg/dL (8.0-11.1 mmol/L), with a speculative upper limit of 145 mg/dL (8.0 mmol/L) for the target blood glucose level.Increased insulin administration is positively associated with death in the ICU regardless of the prevailing blood glucose level. Thus, control of glucose levels rather than of absolute levels of exogenous insulin appear to account for the mortality benefit associated with intensive insulin therapy demonstrated by others.

Hyperglycemia, be it secondary to diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or stress-induced is common in the critically ill. Hyperglycemia and glucose variability in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has some experts calling for routine administration of intensive insulin therapy to normalize glucose levels in hyperglycemic patients. Others, however, have raised concerns over the optimal glucose level, the accuracy of measurements, the resources required to attain tight glycemic control (TGC), and the impact of TGC across the heterogeneous ICU population in patients with diabetes, previously undiagnosed diabetes or stress-induced hyperglycemia. Increased variability in glucose levels during critical illness and the therapeutic intervention thereof have recently been reported to have a deleterious impact on survival, particularly in nondiabetic hyperglycemic patients. The incidence of hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL or 2.2 mmol) associated with TGC is reported to be as high as 18.7%, by Van den Berghe in a medical ICU, although application of various approaches and computer-based algorithms may improve this. The impact of hypoglycemia, particularly in patients with septic shock and those with neurologic compromise, warrants further evaluation. This review briefly discusses the epidemiology of hyperglycemia in the acutely ill and glucose metabolism in the critically ill. It comments on present limitations in glucose monitoring, outlines current glucose management approaches in the critically ill, and the transition from the ICU to the intermediate care unit or ward. It closes with comment on future developments in glycemic care of the critically ill.The awareness of the potential deleterious impact of hyperglycemia was heightened after Van den Berghe et al presented their prospective trial in 2001. Therefore, source data were obtained from PubMed and Cochrane Analysis searches of the medical literature, with emphasis on the time period after 2000. Recent meta-analyses were reviewed, expert editorial opinion collated, and the Web site of the Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation Trial investigated.Hyperglycemia develops commonly in the critically ill and impacts outcome in patients with diabetes but, even more so, in patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia. Despite calls for TGC by various experts and regulatory agencies, supporting data remain somewhat incomplete and conflicting. A recently completed large international study, Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation, should provide information to further guide best practice. This concise review interprets the current state of adult glycemic management guidelines to provide a template for care as new information becomes available.

Fluid management during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients is a dynamic process that encompasses 3 inter-related goals: maintenance of the patency of the CRRT circuit, maintenance of plasma electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis and regulation of patient fluid balance. In this article, we report the consensus recommendations of the 2016 Acute Disease Quality Initiative XVII conference on ‘Precision Fluid Management in CRRT'. We discuss the principles of fluid management, describe various prescription methods to achieve circuit integrity and introduce the concept of integrated fluid balance for tailoring fluid balance to the needs of the individual patient. We suggest that these recommendations could serve to develop the best clinical practice and standards of care for fluid management in patients undergoing CRRT. Finally, we identify and highlight areas of uncertainty in fluid management and set an agenda for future research.

To compare filter survival times during high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with normal coagulation variables, using anti-factor Xa bioequivalent doses of nadroparin and dalteparin. To evaluate which other factors influence filter survival time.Randomized, prospective, double-blind, crossover study.An 18-bed intensive care unit in a 530-bed teaching hospital.Thirty-two critically ill patients with renal failure, treated with high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration.High-volume, postdilutional continuous venovenous hemofiltration, with a standard blood flow rate of 200 mL/min and an ultrafiltrate volume of 100 L in 24 hrs, was performed with a highly permeable, large-surface cellulose triacetate membrane. Anticoagulation with anti-Xa bioequivalent doses of nadroparin and dalteparin was administered in the extracorporeal line before the filter. Blood was sampled for determination of coagulation variables before hemofiltration, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hrs after starting the treatment, and at the end of the hemofiltration run.Anti-Xa peak activity, time of anti-Xa peak activity, area under the curve for 0-3 hrs and filter survival time were not significantly different using nadroparin or dalteparin. When analyzing the patients according to the length of filter survival time, no relationship among anti-Xa peak activity, area under the curve for 0-3 hrs, and filter survival time was found. However, there was a strong trend toward a negative correlation between baseline platelet count and filter survival time (r2 =.11; p =.07). Mean blood urea nitrogen decreased from 81.0+/-31.9 to 41.1+/-21.2 mg/dL (p<.01) and mean creatinine decreased from 3.4+/-1.8 to 1.9+/-1.2 mg/dL (p<.01). There were no clinically important bleeding complications.Nadroparin and dalteparin are bioequivalent with respect to their anti-Xa activities. Using either drug, we did not find a difference in filter survival time during high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration. No relationship between anti-Xa activity and filter survival time could be found. However, there is a strong trend toward a negative correlation between baseline platelet count and filter survival time. This suggests that during high-volume, continuous venovenous hemofiltration, patients with a higher baseline platelet count might need a different anticoagulation regimen to obtain longer filter survival times.

The most common anticoagulant options for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) include unfractionated heparin (UFH), regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), and no anticoagulation. Less common anticoagulation options include UFH with protamine reversal, low‐molecular weight heparin (LMWH), thrombin antagonists, and platelet inhibiting agents. The choice of anticoagulant for CRRT should be determined by patient characteristics, local expertise, and ease of monitoring. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury guidelines recommend using RCA rather than UFH in patients who do not have contraindications to citrate and are with or without increased risk of bleeding. Monitoring should include evaluation of the anticoagulant effect, circuit life, filter efficacy, and complications.

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is used for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The recommended initial dose is 2 microg/kg/min (0.5 microg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values 1.5-3.0 times baseline. However, few argatroban-treated patients with HIT and renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) have been described.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of argatroban anticoagulation during RRT in patients with HIT.We retrospectively reviewed records from 47 patients with HIT and renal failure requiring RRT who underwent 50 treatment courses with argatroban. Patients with HIT had received argatroban during prospective, multicenter studies. Outcomes, safety, and dosing information were summarized.In the multicenter experience, no patient died due to thrombosis and 2 (4%) patients developed new thrombosis while on argatroban. No adverse outcomes occurred during argatroban reexposure. Starting doses were typically 2 microg/kg/min in patients without hepatic impairment and <1.5 microg/kg/min in those with hepatic impairment. Median (range) infusion doses were 1.7 (0.2-2.8) and 0.7 (0.1-1.7) microg/kg/min, respectively, with associated median (range) aPTT ratios, relative to baseline, of 2.2 (1.6-3.6) and 2.0 (1.4-4.1), respectively. Major bleeding occurred in 3 (6%) of 50 treatment courses.Argatroban provides effective anticoagulation upon initial and repeated administration in patients with HIT and renal impairment requiring RRT, with an acceptably low bleeding risk. Current dosing recommendations are adequate for these patients.

To examine the effects of patient and treatment-related variables on filter lifespan in critically ill adults receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study conducted in a tertiary referral centre in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. All CRRT filters used over a 44-month period from 1 January 2008 to 31 August 2011 were assessed for their hours of function before being stopped non-electively (due to clotting) or electively. Analyses were performed primarily for all CRRT filters and secondarily for those ceased non-electively during the study period. To assess for any relationship with filter life, we performed multivariable regression analyses for blood flow rate, anticoagulation type, vascular access site, vascular catheter type, reason for stopping the filter circuit, platelet count and activated partial prothrombin time.A total of 1332 treatments in 355 patients were assessed for filter life. Of these, 474 were electively ceased, leaving 858 filter circuits for secondary analysis. In both analyses, higher blood flow rate predicted longer filter lifespan (P=0.03 for all filters and P=0.04 for non-electively ceased filters). Vascular catheter type was predictive of increased filter lifespan in the non-electively ceased filters (P=0.002) but not on analysis of all filters. Type of anticoagulation and vascular access site were not predictive of filter lifespan in either analysis. Of the patient haematological variables, only platelet count was predictive of increased filter lifespan (P=0.003 for all filters and P< 0.001 for non-electively ceased filters).Our study found that an increased CRRT filter lifespan is associated with higher blood flow rates and lower platelet count. Vascular catheter design may also be a factor.

Background: Optimising filter life and performance efficiency in continuous renal replacement therapy has been a focus of considerable recent research. Larger high quality studies have predominantly focussed on optimal anticoagulation however CRRT is complex and filter life is also affected by vascular access, circuit and management factors. We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify and quantify the effect of vascular access, circuit and patient factors that affect filter life and presented the results as a meta-analysis.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching Pubmed (MEDLINE) and Ovid EMBASE libraries from inception to 29(th) February 2016 for all studies with a comparator or independent variable relating to CRRT circuits and reporting filter life. Included studies documented filter life in hours with a comparator other than anti-coagulation intervention. All studies comparing anticoagulation interventions were searched for regression or hazard models pertaining to other sources of variation in filter life.Results: Eight hundred nineteen abstracts were identified of which 364 were selected for full text analysis. 24 presented data on patient modifiers of circuit life, 14 on vascular access modifiers and 34 on circuit related factors. Risk of bias was high and findings are hypothesis generating. Ranking of vascular access site by filter longevity favours: tunnelled semi-permanent catheters, femoral, internal jugular and subclavian last. There is inconsistency in the difference reported between femoral and jugular catheters. Amongst published literature, modality of CRRT consistently favoured continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHD-F) with an associated 44% lower failure rate compared to CVVH. There was a trend favouring higher blood flow rates. There is insufficient data to determine advantages of haemofilter membranes. Patient factors associated with a statistically significant worsening of filter life included mechanical ventilation, elevated SOFA or LOD score, elevations in ionized calcium, elevated platelet count, red cell transfusion, platelet factor 4 (PF-4) antibodies, and elevated fibrinogen. Majority of studies are observational or report circuit factors in sub-analysis. Risk of bias is high and findings require targeted investigations to confirm.Conclusion: The interaction of patient, pathology, anticoagulation, vascular access, circuit and staff factors contribute to CRRT filter life. There remains an ambiguity from published data as to which site and side should be the first choice for vascular access placement and what interaction this has with patient factors and timing. Early consideration of tunnelled semi-permanent access may provide optimal filter life if longer periods of CRRT are anticipated. There remains an absence of robust evidence outside of anti-coagulation strategies despite over 20 years of therapy delivery however trends favour CVVHD-F over CVVH.