Clinical analysis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in children

Zhang Pei, Wu Heyan, Gao Chunlin, He Xu, Shi Zhuo, Kuang Qianhuining, Yao Jun, Xia Zhengkun

PDF(1206 KB)
Chinese Journal of Nephrology ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 550-553. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20191023-00100
Short Original Article

Clinical analysis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in children

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhang Pei. , Wu Heyan. , Gao Chunlin. , He Xu. , Shi Zhuo. , Kuang Qianhuining. , Yao Jun. , Xia Zhengkun. Clinical analysis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, 2020, 36(7): 550-553. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441217-20191023-00100.
抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody,ANCA)相关性血管炎(ANCA-associated vasculitis,AAV)的发病与ANCA密切相关。髓过氧化物酶ANCA(myeloperoxidase-ANCA,MPO-ANCA)和蛋白酶3-ANCA (protease 3-ANCA,PR3-ANCA)是两种主要的自身抗原靶点,其主要临床病理改变类型为肉芽肿性多血管炎(granulomatosis with polyangiitis,GPA)、显微镜下多血管炎(microscopic polyangiitis,MPA)和嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎(eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis,EGPA)[1]。AAV可累及多系统和脏器,肾脏损伤也称之为ANCA相关性肾小球肾炎(ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis,AAGN),是AAV最常见的临床表现之一,大部分患者最终进入终末期肾脏病(ESRD)。因此,肾脏受累是影响AAV患者预后的一个重要因素[2]。我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2019年1月中国人民解放军东部战区总医院收治的25例AAV患儿临床和肾脏病理资料,报告如下:

一、 对象和方法

1. 对象: 入选2014年6月至2019年6月在中国人民解放军东部战区总医院住院的AAV患儿25例。所有患儿均符合2012年美国Chapel Hill会议修订的AAV诊断标准[3]。根据肾组织病理检查结果分为局灶型组、新月体型组、硬化型组和混合型组[4]。本研究符合赫尔辛基宣言关于医学研究的基本原则,并获解放军东部战区总医院伦理委员会批准(审批文号:2019JLHGKJDWLS-177)。
2. 观察指标: 收集患儿临床表现、实验室检查、肾组织病理检查和治疗方案等资料。25例AAV患儿均接受了肾穿刺活组织检查。
3. 统计学处理: 使用SPSS 25.0统计软件进行数据的统计学处理,符合正态分布的计量资料数据用x¯±s 表示,采用独立样本t检验;偏态分布的计量资料数据用M(1/4,3/4)表示,采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。定性资料用百分率(%)表示,采用独立样本资料R×C列联表的 χ2检验,P<0.05视为差异有统计学意义。

二、 结果

1. 一般资料: 25例患儿中女性21例(84%),男性4例(16%),年龄(13.27±4.42)岁(2~18岁)。病程6~36个月(中位数16个月)。
2. 临床表现、治疗和预后: 25例AAV患儿表现为多器官损害,主要以呼吸系统与泌尿系统为主。25例患儿各系统临床表现发生率见表1。治疗方案参考中国肾脏病学中关于AAV和AAGN的治疗方案[5],以甲基泼尼松龙(MP)冲击和醋酸泼尼松片+环磷酰胺(PAT+CTX)/霉酚酸酯(MMF)治疗为主,治疗后随访 0.5~3年,其中1例死亡,3例进入ESRD期,1例接受同种异体肾移植术。见图1
表1 按肾组织病理分型分组的各组AAV患儿实验室检查结果的比较
项目 局灶型组(n=6) 新月体型组(n=5) 硬化型组(n=8) 混合型组(n=5) P
血CRP(mg/L) 31.38(0.72,44.02) 8.84(0.50,17.54) 14.34(0.63,20.23) 11.23(0.50,18.34) 0.018
血PCT(μg/L) 0.87(0.55,1.04) 0.44(0.18,0.66) 0.67(0.46,0.83) 0.72(0.58,0.89) 0.035
血IL-6(ng/L) 38.36(18.35,55.04) 14.24(7.00,27.19) 25.35(13.28,33.40) 22.20(16.34,28.05) 0.022
Hb(g/L) 106.38(78.35,114.52) 84.35(57.14,96.03) 67.24(45.18,88.04) 82.50(62.62,90.27) 0.024
ESR(mm/h) 68.34(35.42,86.35) 45.14(20.00,57.36) 41.07(24.38,65.04) 37.02(20.00,48.58) 0.008
血ATL(IU/L) 15.07(8.25,19.66) 24.58(7.68,54.26) 10.94(9.55,19.35) 17.24(8.10,23.83) 0.020
血AST(IU/L) 21.34(12.00,28.38) 26.35(14.25,31.43) 20.26(12.00,27.30) 25.04(16.04,35.39) >0.050
BNP(ng/L) 669.49(383.31,829.66) 1 274.48(443.43,1 685.36) 857.87(406.29,1 093.59) 784.41(454.23,978.36) <0.001
血BUN(mmol/L) 20.34(8.34,29.07) 17.36(10.00,25.45) 24.49(11.03,32.32) 23.41(11.12,27.76) >0.050
血UA(μmol/L) 387.39(245.30,543.43) 477.20(312.32,632.77) 511.42(187.23,668.30) 407.28(242.23,533.76) >0.050
治疗前Scr(μmol/L) 150.73(117.97,273.34) 430.57(232.33,568.35) 359.73(155.10,602.95) 217.23(175.45,414.33) <0.001
治疗后Scr(μmol/L) 62.53(42.35,104.35) 126(81.04,163.19) 88.32(62.01,117.44) 92.52(53.02,126.60) 0.038
eGFR 45.72(33.20,93.80) 30.69(27.39,57.78) 56.56(32.27,71.47) 64.39(38.29,94.63) 0.024
血补体C3(g/L) 0.82(0.65,1.44) 1.14(0.73,1.67) 0.67(0.45,0.97) 0.98(0.72,1.53) 0.017
血补体C4(g/L,x¯±s ) 0.29±0.07 0.23±0.06 0.13±0.02 0.18±0.03 >0.050
血CD4(个/ml) 1 099.5(628.0,1 366.0) 1 268.0(521.0,1 684.0) 462.5(425.5,633.0) 865.0(674.0,887.0) <0.001
血CD8(个/ml) 661.5(395.0,791.5) 647.0(423.0,887.0) 451.0(306.8,853.5) 475.0(319.0,764.0) >0.050
血CD20(个/ml) 597.0(385.5,732.0) 362.0(265.0,477.0) 178.5(132.5,264.5) 429.0(236.0,556.0) <0.001
ANA抗体阳性[例(%)] 1(16.67) 2(40.00) 2(25.00) 2(40.00) >0.050
抗ds-DNA抗体阳性[例(%)] 1(16.67) - 1(12.50) 1(20.00) >0.050
抗Sm抗体阳性[例(%)] - 1(20.00) 4(50.00) - >0.050
Coomb's试验阳性[例(%)] 1(16.67) - 1(12.50) 1(20.00) >0.050
尿蛋白量(mg·kg-1·d-1) 43.32(32.20,57.48) 38.48(28.37,67.24) 45.02(32.23,72.27) 42.29(25.40,81.27) >0.050
尿RBC计数(个/ml) 521.35(13.50,743.58) 368.24(45.36,843.29) 646.23(18.35,811.04) 554.26(68.90,1 127.93) >0.050
尿NAG酶(U/g·cr) 34.37(24.39,85.23) 54.81(36.28,112.38) 21.53(17.25,40.28) 46.23(24.23,88.27) 0.038
尿RBP(mg/L,x¯±s ) 10.62±2.12 18.42±3.81 5.23±1.02 7.87±1.54 <0.001
注:CRP:C反应蛋白;PCT:降钙素原;IL-6:白细胞介素-6;ESR:红细胞沉降率;ATL:丙氨酸氨基转移酶;AST:门冬氨酸氨基转移酶;BNP:脑利钠肽前体;BUN:尿素氮;UA:尿酸;eGFR:估算肾小球滤过率,单位为ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1;CD4:CD4 T细胞;CD8:CD8 T细胞;CD20:CD20 B细胞;ANA:抗核抗体;抗ds-DNA抗体:抗双链DNA抗体;Coomb's试验:抗人球蛋白试验;NAG酶:N-乙酰-β-D-葡萄糖苷酶;RBP:视黄醇结合蛋白;“-”代表无数据; 数据形式除已注明外,余数据以M(1/4,3/4)形式表示
图1 AAV患儿各系统临床表现发生率和治疗方案
注:MP:甲基泼尼松龙;PAT:醋酸泼尼松片;CTX:环磷酰胺;MMF:霉酚酸酯;CRRT:连续肾脏替代治疗;PE:血浆置换;RTX:利妥昔单抗

Full size|PPT slide

3. 实验室检查结果: 局灶型组C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平高于新月体型组(P<0.05);硬化型组血红蛋白(Hb)水平低于局灶型(P<0.05);局灶型组红细胞沉降率(ESR)水平高于混合型(P<0.01);新月体型组门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(ATL)水平高于硬化型(P<0.05);新月体型组脑利钠肽前体(BNP)水平高于局灶型(P<0.01);局灶型组治疗前Scr水平低于新月体型组和硬化型组(P<0.001);局灶型组治疗后Scr水平低于新月体型组(P<0.05);新月体型组估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)低于混合型组(P<0.05);硬化型组补体C3、CD4 T细胞数低于新月体型组(P<0.05,P<0.01);硬化型组CD20 B细胞数低于局灶型组(P<0.01)。新月体型组尿N-乙酰-β-D-葡萄糖苷酶(NAG酶)水平高于硬化型(P<0.05);新月型组尿视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)水平高于硬化型和混合型(P<0.01)。见表1

三、 讨论

AAV主要发生在成人,儿童发病率较低。欧洲成人AAV发病率为13~20/100万[6]。近年来儿童AAV的发病率呈上升趋势[7],且以女孩多见,发病年龄中位数为12~14岁。本研究中女性患儿占84%,平均年龄为13.27岁。儿童AAV的临床症状不典型。本组病例临床表现以肺脏和肾脏表现为主,与两脏器血管密度有关。呼吸系统主要表现为肺部影像学异常、咽后壁淋巴滤泡增生和肺部啰音,泌尿系统以蛋白尿、急性肾损伤为主。
2010年国际肾脏病理学家提出AAV相关性肾损伤分为局灶型、新月体型、硬化型和混合型[6]。本组病例中新月体型尿NAG酶高于硬化型,RBP水平高于硬化型和混合型,说明新月体型肾小管损伤较重。局灶型CRP、Hb、ESR、PCT和IL-6水平较高,提示有炎性反应存在,CRP和ESR是AAV活动性的敏感指标。新月体型肝功能损伤明显,新月体型、硬化型及混合型BNP升高明显,提示机体的血流动力学受影响。新月体型和硬化型治疗前Scr最高,新月体型eGFR最低,说明新月体型和硬化型肾功能损伤较重。研究表明,AAV前期肾功能差是ESRD危险因素[7],且基线eGFR是1、5年后肾功能的独立预测指标,GFR<15 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1的患者肾存活率极低。一项研究结果表明,eGFR<15 ml·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1患者中有51%获病情缓解,35%需接受连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)治疗,死亡率为14%[8],且免疫抑制剂治疗并不能阻止肾功能的恶化和改变预后[9]。本组有3例患儿进入ESRD期,其中硬化型2例,新月体型1例,1例死亡病例为硬化型,与文献报道一致。因儿童AAV发病率不高,本文为单中心研究,病例数较少,临床数据分析结果虽与文献研究结果一致,但后期仍需多中心、大样本统计分析不同病理分型的临床数据,指导儿童AAV的治疗和预后。
AAV患者肾损害程度与低补体水平有关,GPA或MPA确诊时已出现低补体血症是影响患儿存活和肾脏预后的重要原因[9]。本研究硬化型组患儿血补体C3水平明显降低。按肾病理分型的4组患儿血自身抗体水平也表现出差异,但因病例数较少,临床意义难以判断。AAV患者有T细胞功能紊乱的表现,CD4 T细胞可抵抗调节性T细胞的抑制作用,且CD4细胞的耗竭降低了疾病的严重程度[10],本研究中局灶型组和新月体型组患儿血CD4 T细胞水平升高。
综上所述,本组AAV患儿以MPO-ANCA为主,临床上以MPA占多数。儿童AAV临床表现不典型,肺脏和肾脏是其主要靶器官。肾脏损伤中以硬化型和新月体型病变较重,预后较差。体液免疫和细胞免疫均参与了AAV的发病和病程进展,实验室检查对指导临床治疗和预后判断有重要意义。

References

[1]
Liu GY, Ventura IB, Achtar-Zadeh N, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in north american patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis[J]. Chest, 2019, S0012- 3692(19): 31132-311328. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.05.014.
[2]
Chen YX, Chen XN. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated glomerulonephritis: from bench to bedside[J]. Chronic Dis Transl Med, 2018, 4(3): 187-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2018.05.004.
[3]
Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 revised international chapel hill consensus conference nomenclature of vasculitides[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2013, 65(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/art.37715.
[4]
Berden AE, Ferrario F, Hagen EC, et al. Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 21(10): 1628-1636. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2010050477.
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis is the most common cause of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis worldwide, and the renal biopsy is the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis. Although the prognostic value of the renal biopsy in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis is widely recognized, there is no consensus regarding its pathologic classification. We present here such a pathologic classification developed by an international working group of renal pathologists. Our classification proposes four general categories of lesions: Focal, crescentic, mixed, and sclerotic. To determine whether these lesions have predictive value for renal outcome, we performed a validation study on 100 biopsies from patients with clinically and histologically confirmed ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. Two independent pathologists, blinded to patient data, scored all biopsies according to a standardized protocol. Results show that the proposed classification system is of prognostic value for 1- and 5-year renal outcomes. We believe this pathologic classification will aid in the prognostication of patients at the time of diagnosis and facilitate uniform reporting between centers. This classification at some point might also provide means to guide therapy.
[5]
黎磊石, 刘志红. 中国肾脏病学[M]. 第1版, 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2008.
[6]
Jariwala MP, Laxer RM. Primary vasculitis in childhood: GPA and MPA in childhood[J]. Front Pediatr, 2018, 16(6): 226. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00226.
[7]
Novick TK, Chen M, Scott J, et al. Patient outcomes in renal-limited antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis with inactive histology[J]. Kidney Int Rep, 2018, 3(3): 671-676. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.01.012.
Little is known about the anticipated disease course for individuals who present with renal-limited antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis but who lack inflammation on a kidney biopsy. The impact of immunosuppression on renal and overall survival is unknown.Patients were recruited from 2005 to 2016 from 8 centers worldwide (N = 16) for this descriptive study. All had positive ANCA, elevated serum creatinine with active urine sediment, histologic evidence of pauci-immune glomerulonephritis without active lesions, and had no evidence of extrarenal vasculitis. We describe the characteristics of this cohort and the differences in the clinical, histologic, and therapeutic parameters of those who developed primary outcomes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and vasculitis relapse.The cohort was 63% Caucasian, and 75% were men, with a median age of 62 years. At entry, the mean ± SD estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 24 ± 20 ml/min per 1.73 m, and 5 patients required dialysis. Twelve patients received immunosuppressive therapy, 25% experienced disease relapse, and 38% developed ESRD. Patients who developed ESRD had lower baseline eGFRs (8 ± 5 ml/min per 1.73 m vs. 35 ± 18 ml/min per 1.73 m;  = 0.001) and more often required dialysis at presentation (83% vs. 0%;  = 0.001). Patients who relapsed were less likely to receive immunosuppression (25% for the relapsed group vs. 92% for the nonrelapsed group; relative risk: 0.27, risk difference: 67%;  = 0.03).Among these patients, lower initial eGFR and dialysis dependence at presentation might increase the risk for ESRD. Immunosuppression did not affect renal outcomes in this sample of patients but was associated with a reduced risk for vasculitis relapse. More information is needed on factors that predict treatment response in this high-risk group.
[8]
Bjørneklett R, Solbakken V, Bostad L, et al. Prognostic factors in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis with severe glomerular sclerosis: a national registry-based cohort study[J]. Patholog Res Int, 2018, 4(3): 5653612. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5653612.
[9]
Deshayes S, Aouba A, Khoy K, et al. Hypocomplementemia is associated with worse renal survival in ANCA-positive granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(4): e0195680. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195680.
[10]
Prendecki M, Pusey CD. Recent advances in understanding of the pathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis[J]. F1000Res, 2018, 7: F1000 Faculty Rev-1113. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.14626.1.
PDF(1206 KB)

729

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/